College Basketball and the NBA Both Being Destroyed by the CBA

Bleacher ReportContributor IFebruary 26, 2011

OAKLAND, CA - NOVEMBER 20:  Greg Oden #52 of the Portland Trail Blazers looks on against the Golden State Warriors during an NBA game at Oracle Arena on November 20, 2009 in Oakland, California.  (Photo by Jed Jacobsohn/Getty Images)
Jed Jacobsohn/Getty Images

The current CBA draft eligibility rules were put in place for the 2005-2006 season.  The rule states; "All drafted players must be at least 19 years old during the calendar year of the draft."  Since this rule has been put into place, college basketball has lost it's Old Spice swagger.  

The number of players that are now playing one year of college basketball has not been the exciting adventure we had once thought it would be. Campuses see star players come and go without them even going to their classes, and why should they go to class?  They're going to be making millions in couple of months.

Perry Jones from Baylor is projected to be one of the first players picked in the upcoming draft.  Since arriving at Baylor, he has shown very little interest on the court.  He continually jogs back on defense as his opponent is fast breaking, as well as not going hard for a loose ball up to this point in the season.

Once again, why should he?  He's going to be taken high in this years draft, so why risk dislocating his elbow? He has no interest in playing there, and now Baylor is responsible to find a new prospect every season. There is a way to fix this problem.  

Recently Tom Izzo of Michigan State has spoken out on the problems with the CBA.  He introduced The Izzo Compromise earlier this week.  The compromise gives players the choice of entering the NBA draft right out of high school or going to college where they will be required to stay for three seasons.  This idea would give each league a huge boost in competitiveness.

It would be a really good step in the right direction for American basketball; however, I would like to see them get away from the compromise all together and require the players to stay for three seasons.  If the players had to stay for three seasons, they would have to be prove themselves again.

Perry Jones wouldn't be jogging up and down the court, for he'd have to prove to Scott Drew that he deserves playing time.  As we all know, every player in college basketball would then be forced to work their asses off, and from doing so they'll develop into a complete NBA player.  

One problem with my non-compromise is the fact that some high school players will just decided to pack up and head over to Europe, but it's really not a problem at all.  These players won't be able to declare for the draft until their 21 anyways, so they can head over to Europe make their money and still develop.

The three year rule is obviously good for college basketball, for it gives them players that want to be there, and it gives them a more consistent roster as well as better players going to mid-major schools. College Basketball is a league ran by great coaches.  With this system in play, these great coaches will have more than one season to critique the players skills and develop them into physically and mentally. 

Because of the great college coaches having the players for three seasons, the NBA will improve immensely.  They league will no longer be forced to draft a player like Kosta Koufus or Byron Mullens. Because their scouts will have more time to do their job, they'll know that some of these recent busts wouldn't amount to anything, and who knows maybe two more years with Thad Matta would have made both of these players into NBA players. 

American Basketball is currently becoming less and less relevant, but with a few changes it will regain it's power.