2011 Royal Rumble and It's Predictability through WWE's Current Writing Staff
As most of you know, this Sunday is WWE’s Tables Ladders and Chairs (TLC) Pay-Per- View, which I personally don’t know if I want to attempt to watch, due to the PG rating.
Well mainly due to the "GAR-BAHG" that was Hell in a Cell and the refusal to show blood anymore on TV.
So, I’m skipping on my monthly Pay-Per-View feelings (just know that I’m picking Miz to beat Orton) and moving on to the 2011 ROYAL RUMBLE!
But, I’m not going to talk about the whole PPV just the ROYAL RUMBLE.
Currently, the way I see everything finishing up at the RUMBLE is the following:
I’m picking the idea that it will be Sheamus, Morrison, Cena, Barrett with someone from Smackdown, as the five people to be in the ring before the main surprise comes out.
Last year, I picked EDGE to come back and win it all.
I was right!
This year, it’s the return of the GAME, Triple H.
Simple, the main reason for Sheamus to be crowned KOR (King of the Ring) was just another way to form the angle between himself and Hunter.
As Triple H makes his way to the ring, he’ll beat up on Sheamus, Morrison will have already been eliminated, leaving Triple H, Cena, Barrett, the Smackdown Guy and Sheamus.
One way or another Hunter eliminates Sheamus and then someone eliminates the GAME (I don’t care what order, just know he’s eliminated).
Following that, Barrett will probably eliminate the Smackdown guy and it will end up being Barrett/Cena as the final two with Cena winning.
Which makes a great main event for ‘Mania”, having Cena face The Miz for the belt.
This is due to McMahon being very high on Cena's storyline and The Miz as a heel.
Plus, I don't find it just a "coincidence" that The Miz and Cena are back to back on the 2011 Royal Rumble Poster!
Also, Triple H /Sheamus at Wrestlemania.
That’s how I see it!
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?