Kelly Pavlik's Bid for History: Slaying the Executioner

Hopkins-Pavlik looks like a guaranteed snoozer, but has the potential to make history. Eric Fleury wonders if the Executioner can redeem his faded legacy, or if Pavlik will finally vanquish the one-time middleweight king?

by Eric Fleury (Contributor)

4

653 reads

Editorial

August 06, 2008

Boxing, Kelly Pavlik, Bernard Hopkins, Editorial

It’s awfully hard for fight fans to look forward to the upcoming Kelly Pavlik-Bernard Hopkins bout when even its promoter, Bob Arum, admits that Pavlik “isn’t thrilled with the fight.”

This reluctance from the middleweight king is not surprising.

In his first year as champ he has defended his title only once, in a routine pummeling of unknown Gary Lockett.  Now he faces yet another non-title fight at an arbitrary catch weight, against a 43-year-old who will draw little PPV revenue and possesses a cagey style that has rendered him immune from knockout throughout a 20-year career.

But while Pavlik should be eager to dominate at 160 lbs. and make good on Arum’s promise to establish a Hagler-like legacy, this fight presents a unique opportunity for the Youngstown native to make the transition from titleholder to true champion.

Ultimately, boxing is savagery. And the sheer magnitude of the suffering and trauma endemic to the sport has created an assumption that a fighter will inevitably be consumed by his trade.

  • B/R Ticket Guide

Reinforced by both the history of the game and the universal demand that what goes up must come down, we fully expect that there is a tragic arc to even the greatest career. 

Whether it’s a hero like Floyd Patterson or a villain like Sonny Liston, the pathos of that moment where he succumbs to fate becomes as intrinsic to his legacy as the elation of his first title.  Like a pride of lions, the old leader retires only when slain by the young challenger.

This brings us to Hopkins, the self-styled “Executioner” who at 43 remains capable and lucid, if not particularly exciting.  Having dominated the middleweight division for 12 years and after two losses to Jermain Taylor in 2005, he remains respectable but overly defensive and incredibly boring.

Also, his villainous routine—complete with black robe, axe-wielding entourage, and endless trash talk—has devolved from fearsome to irritating as his championship aura fades from memory. 

Nonetheless, he remains a Hall of Fame fighter, who deserves better than another split-decision slapping match before fading into irrelevance.

He deserves a chance to go down swinging, to redeem himself or nobly fall in the attempt.  He deserves Kelly Pavlik, the relentless, undefeated power-puncher who, after dealing Taylor his first loss in brutal fashion back in September, has emerged as a potential star for the casual fan.

Although Pavlik “isn’t thrilled,” this fight offers him his first chance to seize the limelight by sealing the fate of a great, albeit faded, fighter who happens to be his predecessor at the middleweight division.

Of course, Pavlik’s victory, especially by KO, is no guarantee.

But if he can do this, he has everything to gain: the notoriety of ending a great career, supremacy at middleweight by besting its last champion, and most importantly, the chance to play a prominent role in the dark drama that is boxing, where glory is achieved by standing over the battered relic of yesterday’s hero.

Editorial

653 views

Share:

  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Print

comments (4) write a comment »

  1. A good article with soild points. B-Hop defintiely deserves another big fight. Even though this doesnt look like a very exciting matchup their will be alot of drama and anticipation involved. The pre-fight happenings should be interesting to watch.

  2. This most def wont be a great fight to watch if Bernard has any success. Recently all his fights have become huge stinkfests, where he nullifies his opponent to a certain degree but doesn't do quite enough to win. The bad part is I would have picked him to beat Pavlik if Bernard were a few years younger. He is probably going to lose a decision to Pavlik, and I hope he retires soon.

  3. I'm no boxing expert but it seems as if you are right. Kelly needs to fight someone more well known to get his name out a bit. I live in his hometown so there is no shortage of discussion about him here.

    I'm always pulling for him though and hope he keeps it up. I

  4. Great article. I really like your imagery - Pavlik standing over the carcass of Hopkins. I disagree with you and the guys who left comments about Hopkins being a boring fighter. Certainly he is not a knockout artist, which is always exciting, but he is a master craftsman (second only to James Toney) who breaks down his opponent over the course of 12 rounds. As an immense fan of boxing I appreciate his subtlety and skill as much as a good knockout. His domination of Trinidad will always standout as the pinnacle of boxing artistry, and though he is no longer at that level any more he still has skill. Having said that Pavlik is going to win the fight by decision.

write a new comment


Edit this Article Article History

About the Author Eric Fleury (contributor)

  • 2 articles written
  • 1 comments posted
  • 2 fans

FREE SPORTS TEXT ALERTS

  • Get team scores and news sent to your cell phone during and after each game.
  • We do not charge for these services, but standard messaging rates or other charges apply.
  • Cancel anytime by replying STOP to any message.

Step 1: Choose a team

League:

Step 2: Enter your phone number

( ) -
Standard Messaging Rates or other charges apply. To Opt-out text STOP to 4INFO (44636). For more information text HELP to 4INFO (44636). Contact your carrier for more details.

Want to write for Bleacher Report

We are a community of fans who write about sports. And we're growing.

Learn More and Sign Up »