High-Powered Offenses Will Battle for Big 12 Title in 2008
This is my first conference that I will be previewing. You can read my first college football preview here. So heeeere we go.
The Big 12 had a good year last year, with two teams making BCS games and one team winning, but they have not had a National Title player for a while. That could very well change this year. Oklahoma and Missouri are the leading contenders in the Big 12, but Texas, Kansas, and Texas Tech could also compete for a national title bid.
This league is full of offensive talent across the board. Texas Tech led the nation in many offensive categories last year, and like always, they should be at the top again. Missouri's high-powered offense from last year should be very good too.
Kansas' offense will have to prove that they can do it again against better competition, but they should be pretty good. Oklahoma has Sam Bradford, the most efficient passer in the nation—and he's only a sophomore.
Nebraska started to get better on the offensive end last year with Joe Ganz at the helm, and he'll be back. Even Baylor may have a decent offense with Art Briles' running-style spread offense. The other teams should have some good offenses also.
The league's defense won't be too shabby either, with many teams returning lots of starters.
So without further ado, here are the team by team previews for the Big 12.
On offense, the Bears may not be too shabby. They have four options at QB and a pretty good backfield, although they need a go-to guy at receiver if their offense is going to be able to compete. David Gettis appears to be this candidate for the Bears if he can be consistent.
The offensive line returns four starters with good depth at all positions, so they have the foundation of a good offense. They just need to find out if they have the rest of the pieces.
On defense, Baylor has not been very good for the last decade. Art Briles is trying to fix that. They are trying to be a lot more physical than last year's team and make more plays. They were dead last in turnover margin, and if they want to compete in the Big 12, they need to take care of the ball and take it away more from their opponent.
The Bears' linebackers should be the backbone of the defense. They have depth and talent at the position. The D-line has good starters but is not very deep.
We know: That Baylor is not going to become a Big 12 power overnight. This will take more than a year to turn around.
A surprise: Is that the Bears should not be looked at as an easy win on the schedule anymore. Art Briles is changing the attitude at Baylor—and if they have the attitude, they can win some games in the conference.
Predicted Record: 4-8
Offensively, Colorado brings back QB Cody Hawkins, who will only continue to improve. They need some wide receivers to step up and help him out though.
The running back situation doesn't look too good. Sure, they have highly touted Darrell Scott, but he is only a freshman. They don't really have much experience at this position. The offensive line is a little shaky after losing two starters and two key players.
Defensively, the Buffs will be decent at best. The line looks good on the inside, but there are questions about the ends.
At LB, they have some big shoes to fill with the loss of Jordon Dizon. If they find someone that can play his position at least half as well as Dizon did, then they should be OK at backer. The DBs should be average to above average, having to replace Terrence Wheatley.
We know: That CU has lots of depth at almost every position
A surprise: Is that the Buffs might be young and inexperienced, but they actually have some very good talent in Boulder. They have a chance to be very good if they get the right formula.
Predicted Record: 7-5
Offensively, the quarterback has not yet been determined, but they have lots of depth at running back, which is always good. The receivers aren't the cream of the crop, while the line has experience, but the starting jobs are still up for grabs. Don't expect a great offense from Ames this year.
On defense, the line has good talent but not a lot of experience. The linebackers return only one starter. The defensive backs are the strength of this defense, which is good with all the spread offenses in the league.
We know: They aren't going to have a dynamic offense or stonewall defense.
A surprise: Is the Cyclones could actually have a very successful defense, maybe one of the best in the conference, because their secondary is very good. That is key against the spread.
Predicted Record: 3-9
On offense, the Jayhawks have six returning starters, including quarterback Todd Reesing. If Jocques Crawford lives up to his hype, then they should be good in the backfield with Jake Sharp and Angus Quigley returning. Reesing should have plenty of options to throw to at wideout, but tight end is a question mark.
The line has to replace two tackles, and this could be a weak point for KU this year.
KU's defense returns nine starters and could be a force to be reckoned with in the Big 12. The linebackers return three senior starters and should be the best in the league barring injury. The D-line should be pretty good too.
The defensive backs take a blow in losing Aqib Talib, but the Jayhawks have decent depth and should be pretty good also.
We know: Kansas can't fly under the radar again—teams will be prepared this time around.
A surprise: The Hawks were not a fluke last year, and they will be back. With a few breaks this team could be top five material...or at least top 10.
Predicted Record: 8-4
Offensively, the Wildcats aren't going to blow people away. At quarterback they have Josh Freeman, who has a strong arm, but many question his accuracy.
As far as options for Freeman, the Cats lose Jordy Nelson, their previous top receiver. If a few of the 19 JUCOs that Ron Prince has brought in can step up, then the offense won't be so bad. The offensive line has five seniors and five juniors, so they have experience and depth.
On the defensive side of the ball, K-State has a great pass rusher in Ian Campbell. The linebackers should be fast, but they are lacking in size. As for the secondary, they should be decent, but they won't be shutting people out.
We know: Ron Prince got a little desperate and brought in 19 JUCOs.
A surprise: Is that this move could pay off greatly and they could compete for the North—or it could come back and bite them in the butt.
Predicted Record: 6-6
On the offensive side, the Tigers should be extremely good once again. The offensive line loses two players, but as long as they find some decent replacements there, they should be just fine.
Chase Daniel comes back, hungry for another shot at Oklahoma, as do a slew of talented targets for him. At running back, Derrick Washington is probably going to start for the Tigers this year.
Defensively, the Tigers return 10 starters. Led by William Moore, this should be a very stingy defense. The linebackers should be great, but they don't have a lot of depth there. The line loses nose tackle Lorenzo Williams but should be fine. The defensive backs should be very good as well.
We know: That the Tigers have a chance at the title if they learn to handle all the pub.
A surprise: The defense has the potential to be one of the best in the Big 12.
Predicted Record: 11-1
On offense, the Huskers started to improve last year with Joe Ganz at the helm. He will have some good options to throw to and a great running back to help out with the offense. Marlon Lucky skipped out on the NFL, so expect him to be ready to impress the scouts this year.
As for the line, they are deep and experienced. This unit could actually be pretty good and scare some defenses.
On D, the Blackshirts were absolutely terrible last year. They aren't going to be insanely good after one offseason, so don't expect anything amazing from the Blackshirts. Sure, they'll improve—there isn't anywhere to go but up—but they won't be a top 10 defense.
The line should be pretty good, but the linebackers could be weak. The secondary is questionable, but with Bo Pelini as the coach, they could turn out to be decent.
We know: The Cornhuskers aren't going to run away with a Big 12 North title.
A surprise: Is that the Nebraska offense has great potential with Joe Ganz at QB and Marlon Lucky at RB. Combined with a very good offensive line, they could be a top three offense in the conference.
Predicted Record: 8-4
The Sooners' offense will be led by Sam Bradford, the nation's most efficient passer as a freshman last year. At running back, DeMarco Murray and Chris Brown will share the load—both are very good backs. The Sooners have good receivers and an excellent tight end in Jermaine Gresham.
The offensive line should be the best in the Big 12. They have seven very talented, experienced linemen that can all start and dominate up front. This could be the best line in the nation.
The defensive backs have good talent, but they still have to decide the best fit for Lendy Holmes, who can play corner or safety very well. The linebackers lose Curtis Lofton to the NFL, which is a pretty big blow. They won't be the best in the Big 12.
The line suffered some injuries this spring, but the backups stepped up and showed that the D-line at OU has very good depth. The talent is there too.
We know: That the Sooners have all the pieces for a national title run.
A surprise: Is that OU's previous strength, linebacker, may be a huge weakness this year. Hopefully for the Sooners, the D-line and secondary will be enough.
Predicted Record: 12-0
The Cowboys have a good, versatile quarterback in Zac Robinson. They lack experience at receiver and running back, but they have young potential. If they can step it up, they could have a real good offensive unit.
The O-line is a very underrated group. They have experience and decent depth and should be in the top half of the league, if not the top three.
On defense, Okie State's defense looked pretty good in the spring game. The line has potential but lacks experience. The linebackers only return one starter, so they are questionable at this point.
At secondary, the 'Boys brought in JUCO safety Lucien Antoine, who is expected to help them tremendously. Along with him, they have a senior free safety and two returning corners.
We know: That the Cowboys have lots of questions on offense and defense.
A surprise: Is that the OSU offense is underrated and could surprise a lot of people—especially the offensive line.
Predicted Record: 6-6
On the offensive side of the ball, the Horns should be really good. Colt McCoy returns at QB, but he lost a few of his options from last year. At running back, they lost Jamaal Charles, but they should be all right with three dependable backs to replace his production.
The line is very deep and very talented. They could challenge Oklahoma for best line in the league.
The Horns have an inexperienced secondary, and this could be their weak link. Only one starter returns in the secondary. The defensive line boasts talented and deep ends and two quick starting tackles. At linebacker, the Longhorns have pretty good potential and some good backups.
We know: The Longhorns will be very good, as usual.
A surprise: Is that they are being overshadowed by Oklahoma and Missouri this year. If everyone is talking about MU and OU, then Texas could actually be under the radar, at least for a few weeks, which could allow them to get the upper hand in the conference.
Predicted Record: 9-3
On offense, quarterback Stephen McGee has to adjust to Mike Sherman's new offense, but it should feature less QB running so he can stay healthy. The Aggies have a very good backfield with Michael Goodson leading the way and some talented backups.
Oh, I almost forgot to mention Javorskie Lane, the fullback. 6'0". 285 pounds. That's all you need to know.
The Aggies have good receivers for a short passing game but still lack a deep threat. The line has good starters but only two reliable backups.
Only one starter returns on the defensive line, so there is work to be done there. The linebackers have promising potential but are unproven and have little depth. The secondary is the strength of the defense, but they won't be the Big 12's best by any means.
We know: The Aggies have tons of questions, especially on defense.
A surprise: Is the Ags may have a pretty good offense if their line can stay healthy and they can find a deep threat for the passing game.
Predicted Record: 5-7
On offense, the Red Raiders are always good, but they return 10 starters this year. Barring any serious injuries, these guys will be scary good. Graham Harrell knows the offense like the back of his hand. Although the running game isn't huge, it still counts, and they will be fine here with three or four reliable backs.
The receivers are led by Michael Crabtree, and they have many other great, fast, strong receivers that will eat up secondaries like no other. The line should be very good too, with all five starters returning.
Best. Offense. In. The. Conference. At least, it will be the most productive offense.
On defense, the Raiders return eight starters. Usually defense is a weakness for TTU, but this year is different. The line returns four serviceable starters. They have a fast, talented group of linebackers, but they don't have a ton of experience.
The defensive backs are talented, and there are many spots in the secondary that are too close to call right now.
We know: That Texas Tech will have a ridiculously amazing offense. They'll get their points week in and week out. They'll get their yards week in and week out.
A surprise: Is that they will have a good defense too. It may not be the best in the Big 12, but if they are good enough to at least slow down the other high-powered Big 12 offenses, this Red Raider team could be playing for a national title.
Predicted Record: 10-2
How they'll finish
5. Kansas State
6. Iowa State
2. Texas Tech
4. Oklahoma State
5. Texas A&M
BIG 12 CHAMPIONSHIP
Missouri Tigers vs. Oklahoma Sooners
BIG 12 CHAMPION
The Oklahoma Sooners beat the Tigers in the rematch from last year's title game. The big difference will be OU's offensive line dominating the Tiger defensive line.
***Thanks for reading, please leave comments if you like, dislike, agree, or disagree***
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?