Shut Up and Play: The Idiocy of Fusing Sports and Politics
Politics—the art of the impossible.
So often, I hear that phrase and so often it rings quite true.
Politics is a sleazy arena where opportunism is shamelessly disguised as an allegedly noble quest for the common good.
In many cases, politics can shamelessly infiltrate environments that are by nature apolitical, such as religion and sports.
There has been a great deal of political fuss surrounding the recently passed Arizona state law regarding illegal immigration.
I am not going to declare where I stand on this particular law. I am neither a resident of Arizona, nor a resident of any "border state," thus, I am the first to admit my physical dis-attachment to the issues involved in that particular political debate.
However, I am going to voice my opinion on those opinionators who consider it a sensible view to infiltrate the political discussion by dragging sports along with it. I am directing this at you, Charles Barkley!
In a recent interview with Sports Media Watch, Charles Barkley defended the talk of sports boycotts in Arizona with the argument that sports and politics have frequently fused in the past.
He cited the 1980 Summer Olympics boycott of the Moscow Games and Muhammad Ali as two prime examples. But, little does Mr. Barkley realize that this is a foolish argument.
Yes, Mr. Barkley, sports and politics have mixed in the past, but that was not the question, Sir Charles! The question was, "Should politics and sports mix?"
The correct answer, Sir Charles, is "NO!"
Leave the environment of sports to its athletes and fans. Leave the environment of politics to its politicians and voters.
Sports is entertainment for the consuming pleasure of the many fans who attend the games with accountability that can be delivered at the ticket window.
Politics is for the constituents to analyze and weigh with accountability that can be delivered at the ballot box.
If honest political debate cannot be had in the political arena, then how dare we proclaim our nation to be a free republic with open exchanges of ideas?
The political arena already has a mechanism in place for the people to voice their displeasure at public policy. It is called the polling booth. Perhaps you are unfamiliar with that concept, Sir Charles! It is an effective system that has lasted in this country since the election of George Washington in 1789.
But instead of devoting faith in the system correcting itself from perceived political miscues and mistakes, these boycott advocates have turned a local issue into a national one in which sports has become fused with politics.
Politics, indeed, is the art of the impossible. Impossibly, it has now found a permanent branch in the entertainment arena!
Dare we call ourselves a free republic anymore?
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?