Sign up or login to track your favorite teams

Sign Up for Bleacher Report

As a registered user you can subscribe to your favorite teams, post comments, write your own articles, and much more.

You must register in order for that functionality to work!







Validating sign up form ...

Bleacher Report articles are written by fans like you

Do you want to cover your favorite sports, teams, and leagues?

Processing writing preferences ...

Great, , you're signed up!

i.e. Big 10, LeBron James, USC Football

Selected Tags:

Logging in ...

As the frenzy of free agency has abated, we can sit back and examine the results with more perspective. The gist of my stance on the Rangers’ offseason is simple: I trust Glen Sather completely, and so should you...

State of the New York Rangers: A Positive Outlook on Glen Sather's Overhaul

by Bernie Horowitz (Scribe)

18

696 reads

Opinion

July 15, 2008


As the frenzy of free agency has abated, we can sit back and examine the results with more perspective.

The gist of my stance on the Rangers’ offseason is simple: I trust Glen Sather completely, and so should you. “Why?” People ask, and quickly point to the dark years of the early 2000s.

Let’s start at the beginning. Glen Sather took over from Neil Smith, who, while he deserves credit for winning the Stanley Cup in 1994, dismantled the team not only in the short term, but for the future as well. The price of the win-now team of 1994 was almost unprecedented.

If you think that Colby Armstrong, Erik Christensen and Angelo Esposito was a high price for two months of Marian Hossa, how about the group led by Tony Amonte, Doug Weight and Mike Gartner?

Soon after the party was over, Glenn Anderson, Stephane Matteau, and Brian Noonan were gone, and Esa Tikkanen was in his last throws. In 1997, GM Smith again reloaded for a win-now team. The next season, with Mark Messier gone, Adam Graves was no longer the same, and Leetch, Gretzky, and Richter could not win by themselves.

Literally NOTHING was left in the Rangers’ system. When a prospect made a mark, he found himself gone with surprising speed (i.e., Marc Savard).

Enter Glen Sather, the architect of maybe the most powerful dynasty of all-time. Rangers fans forget that Glen Sather built a team so powerful that he was able to relinquish Wayne Gretzky in his prime and still win the Stanley Cup.

Sather's talent evaluating ability in the early 80s may be unparalleled in the history of the NHL. In a span of several years, Sather picked up stars such as Grant Fuhr and Paul Coffey in the early first round of the draft, but it is his later-round selections that are amazing.

Mark Messier (third round), Glenn Anderson (fourth round), Andy Moog (seventh round), Jari Kurri (fourth round), Esa Tikkanen (fourth round) are all examples of Sather’s talent gauging ability.

Admittedly, Sather’s magic touch was nowhere to be seen as the Oilers finally faded. However (as a headline bragged while Lou Lamoriello struggled with his mistakes just following the lockout), “Slats is back.”

Glen Sather has built the Rangers back up. There is no longer a huge hole in the minor leagues, as was the case under Neil Smith. The minor league system teems with prospects such as by Bobby Sanguinetti and Alexei Cherepanov.

It is time that Rangers fans appreciated Sather for what he has done the last couple of years.

I don’t feel that he has the respect he deserves for several reasons: First, that he is friends with Jim Dolan (no further explanation required). Second, that the Rangers did not win for the first four years Sather was general manager. Third, because we have not yet fully seen the extent of the young talent pool Sather has compiled.

Track this Article on My B/R
Flag This Article
Share This Article

18 comments Last one added 11 months ago — Leave a Comment

  1. Alan Bass 11 months ago

    great first article, bernie, im very impressed. keep up the good work

    Edit Comment Cancel

    Reply
    Great Comment (
    0
    )

  2. Greg Caggiano 11 months ago

    Rangers are definately headed in the right direction...

    Edit Comment Cancel

    Reply
    Great Comment (
    0
    )

  3. Muddah Phuckah 11 months ago

    Tom Reney's system is also defensive (even if its not 'ultra'). He was a defenseman himself, so don't expect him to let that new guys to be offensive enough.

    Edit Comment Cancel

    Reply
    Great Comment (
    0
    )

  4. Bernie Horowitz 11 months ago

    I disagree. Tom Renney uses Detroit's system, which allows forwards plenty of opportunity to score, as you saw in the playoffs. Naslund came to New York partly because he was sick of the defensive style of Vancouver, you can see that if you look at TSN's coverage of his departure. Besides, if the Rangers intended to go to an ultra-defensive system, they would never have made the Zherdev trade.

    Edit Comment Cancel

    Reply
    Great Comment (
    0
    )

  5. Tim Bogdansky 11 months ago

    Remember the "trap" the Devils used to play, its in New York now. Naslund is gonna see more of the same!

    Edit Comment Cancel

    Reply
    Great Comment (
    0
    )

  6. Timothy Leary 11 months ago

    i wouldn't say naslund is completely escaping from the "ultra-defensive trapping system" you mentioned. sather took a page out of lamoriello's book this year by relying on more neutral zone turnovers to create odd-man rushes. you think with all that offensive starpower (drury, gomez, jagr, straka, shanny, etc.) they had this year they would have scored more than 213 goals.

    Edit Comment Cancel

    Reply
    Great Comment (
    0
    )

  7. Timothy Leary 11 months ago

    as for redden, rangers fans better pray to god that those cocaine rumors aren't true or his career is going to go down a slippery slope a la theo fleury

    Edit Comment Cancel

    Reply
    Great Comment (
    0
    )

  8. Bernie Horowitz 11 months ago

    Timothy, the following article shows why you can't equate the style played by Vancouver with that of the Rangers. Naslund left because of a "stifling defensive system," there's no comparison.

    http://www.tsn.ca/story/?id=242496

    Edit Comment Cancel

    Reply
    Great Comment (
    0
    )

    • Timothy Leary 11 months ago

      you didn't read what i wrote. i never equated the rangers style of play to that of the canucks. i'm equating it to the devils style of play. hence, "sather took a page out of lamoriello's book this year by relying on more neutral zone turnovers to create odd-man rushes." the reason the rangers had so much more success against the devils this year than in previous seasons is because they were beating them at their own game

      Edit Comment Cancel

      Reply
      Great Comment (
      0
      )

  9. Bernie Horowitz 11 months ago

    You said, "i wouldn't say naslund is completely escaping from the "ultra-defensive trapping system" you mentioned." That's what I was referring to with my response. You're right, the Devils don't play that style anymore.

    Edit Comment Cancel

    Reply
    Great Comment (
    0
    )

  10. Greg Caggiano 11 months ago

    Allain Vigneault and his system is the reason why Naslund's play slipped. Even in Renney's defensive system, Naslund would have way much more offensive freedom.

    Edit Comment Cancel

    Reply
    Great Comment (
    0
    )

  11. Fred Winters 11 months ago

    Good analysis of what next year looks like, Bernie, but Glen Sather didn't build the Oilers. John Muckler was the GM who did that. Sather was the coach - and he had a world of talent to work with. He started to make some good moves for the Rangers last year and this year looks great, too, but he stuck with Jagr for at least a year or two too long and limited the team as a result. He deserves a lot of credit for refusing to deal away young talent, but I'm not sure he deserves all the credit for stocking the minors with talent. The Rangers have a hell of a scouting staff.

    Edit Comment Cancel

    Reply
    Great Comment (
    0
    )

    • Bernie Horowitz 11 months ago

      Fred, Sather became the GM of the Oilers in 79-80 and basically ran the team well into the ninteties. Muckler was an assistant coach until 1987, when he began to split the coaching duties with Sather. Unless I've missed something (and Muckler held another position in addition to being an assistant coach) I don't know how you can claim that Sather didn't build that dynasty.

      Edit Comment Cancel

      Reply
      Great Comment (
      0
      )

  12. Vincent Accardi 11 months ago

    Nice article about sathers moves. The only thing not mentioned is the lack of a defenseman who will take your head off when you go to the crease and or go near the King. No team will fear going to the net with our defense. Now if the young guys add some muscle and a nasty side and Redden,Mara and Kalinin show some meaness we could be ok but we still need a big nasty back there. Someone who will drop the gloves when the King is slashed or just nudged. It looks like the forwards have gotten some more muscle and nastiness which is good, now just add that to a talented defense and we should be just fine.

    Edit Comment Cancel

    Reply
    Great Comment (
    0
    )

    • Bernie Horowitz 11 months ago

      Thanks Vincent, and I agree with what you said. It's a shame the Rangers didn't get a mean defenseman. Maybe when Staal matures a bit more (it makes me laugh thinking that maturation means more violence) he can take that role and give the King the protection he deserves.

      Edit Comment Cancel

      Reply
      Great Comment (
      0
      )

  13. Greg Caggiano 11 months ago

    Brooks Orpik was what we really needed...

    Edit Comment Cancel

    Reply
    Great Comment (
    0
    )

  14. matt smith 11 months ago

    zherdev is going to explode for the rangers this season with some talented players. he was a steal for only tyutin and backman.

    Edit Comment Cancel

    Reply
    Great Comment (
    0
    )

  15. eric b 11 months ago

    ok yeah i've heard that whole 'Renney's system is a defensive one" thing. you know what it is not true. The system is NOT built around defense, like a trap. They want players to be defensively responsible when coming back in the neutral zone or in their own zone. they do not want players to give up chances for the puck in the offensive zone and drop back on D like other systems. yes the rangers Dman will more often than not drop back instead of pinching in, but the forwards have free reign to do what they want in the offensive zone. People used "Renney's system" as an excuse why an aging player like jagr offense would drop.

    Edit Comment Cancel

    Reply
    Great Comment (
    0
    )

Leave a Comment

  • You must register to post a comment.

    • Want to write for Bleacher Report

    We are a community of fans who write about sports. And we're growing.

    Learn More and Sign Up »

    Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Getty Images.
    Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Getty Images is strictly prohibited.