Now I know how Staten Island feels. As a Brooklynite I would take my trash to the street. Anything useless and unwanted would be at the curb pronto. Then sanitation would come and haul my stuff along with every one else’s to Staten Island.
I would say, “That deal is awful for the Staten Islanders.” I wondered why don’t they stop it—then I realized the residents had no say. Brooklyn had found a spot for its garbage and Staten Island was willing to take it.
Apparently that type of give and take relationship does not only apply to disposable products amongst boroughs, but also to disposable players amongst teams. And it seems in this act, the role of Brooklyn will be played by Chicago, while the role of Staten Island has been filled by the Knicks.
This relationship between the two cities started out on equal footing. Both sides gave and took equal value. When the Knicks acquired Charles Oakley for Bill Cartwright, both teams were filling a void. Each side was happy.
But that was then. In the most recent transactions between the two franchises, the Knicks have been sold lemons.
In 2005, the Knicks got Eddy Curry. He was supposed to be an offensive force that was talented and quick footed in the paint. In exchange we gave up Tim “Fugasy” Thomas and up-and-comer Mike Sweetney. Other than ratcheting up the payroll, Mr. Curry has not improved the Knickerbockers.
Now, to be fair, like all garbage dumps, there are bound to be hidden treasures. For example, Jamal Crawford.
Jamal, at times, seems to be the only Knick aware that there is a game to be played. He is one of the few Knicks that cares about winning. He plays with all of his heart and it shows on the court. The attitude that some of his teammates take, “who cares if we win or lose, we get paid anyway,” does not appear to rub off on him.
The latest move in the Chi-NY trade route hopefully infuses the Knicks with a player carrying a team-first attitude like Jamal.
That player is Chris Duhon. What category will he fall in? At his tenure at Duke, he was a slightly above-average player, with a talented cast of characters like Carlos Boozer and Jason Williams around him.
The problem with Chris in New York is that he won’t have that type of talent around him. Can he be successful with much less?
Also, he is poised to start? All indications suggest that Stephon will not be a Knick next season. Coming off the bench in Chicago is a very different animal than being the starting point guard for the Knicks. It is understandable that his career offensive numbers are low, due to his lack of playing time, but how much can the Knicks anticipate from him?
3 comments Last one added 12 months ago — Leave a Comment
Harris Beringer 12 months ago
I completely disagree with your assessment of the Bulls-Knicks relationship.
First of all, Curry would not be terrible if they coached him and used him properly (scoring center coming off the bench).
The Bulls weren't exactly incredible last year, remember they got the #1 draft pick?
Jamal Crawford is terrible. I don't care what kind of skill he sometimes exhibits. His shot selection is among the worst I've ever seen, he is not a good defender, and he doesn't rebound. His play makes me cringe, and I bet his stupid shots discourage the rest of the team too.
Edit Comment Cancel
Tyler Jones 12 months ago
Some decent points, but Harris has some pretty good ones. As Charles would say, "Crawford is terrrible. Just terrrible."
Edit Comment Cancel
Bill Obenauer 12 months ago
Duhon may not be an All-Star point guard, but he is a good three-point shooter who plays tough defense. His signing signifies a lot. Read : http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/860281/duhon_agrees_to_terms_with_knicks.html?cat=14
Edit Comment Cancel
Leave a Comment
You must register to post a comment.