The Fading Magic of Wrestling Commentary: Lost Art or Just a Phase?

Rocky GettersSenior Writer IJanuary 24, 2010

There are many entities that contribute to a spectacular wrestling experience for an audience.  While the dazzling in-ring performances by the wrestlers and the effort they must put into each show, understandably and deservedly, get all the attention, there is an element that perhaps goes unnoticed, but has just a profound, subconscious command over our emotions during our experience.

That force is the beautiful magic of wrestling commentary.

As millions of TV audiences watch their favorite wrestlers battle it out in this male soap opera that is pro-wrestling, it is the team of wrestling commentators whose sole duty is to make that journey as real, as intense, and as entertaining as possible.

It is their responsibility to get their viewers involved in the action; acquaint them with feuds; make them hate or love the characters; get them all riled up to care about their show; make even the dullest of slaps sound like the deafening thunder of Thor’s hammer!  Folks, wrestling commentary is not just a skill, it is an art.

When the older generations of wrestling fans talk about the good old days of wrestling , inevitably, The Attitude Era comes up.  The mere thought of those edgy story-lines,  the fierce rivalries, those in-your-face characters and all that mind-boggling action is almost orgasmic to a wrestling fan.

But it is almost impossible to imagine that time without certain non-wrestling characters: the wrestling commentators. In fact, throughout the evolution of pro-wrestling in the TV world, which enabled it to become a larger, more popular product, commentary has played a major role in marketing it.

Who can forget the legendary pairing of Bobby “The Brain” Heenan and Gorilla Monsoon on All Star Wrestling and All American Wrestling in the mid-'80s, or for the younger readers, the classic RAW commentators—Jerry “The King” Lawler and Jim Ross about a decade later?

They made you care about wrestling. It was not just a bland, mundane description of various holds and submissions;  it was a blockbuster brand of powerful, emotional, controversial commentary that made you think, that got you agitated, that got you talking to your TV sets as you witnessed the in-ring genius.

Don’t believe me? Try watching the entrance of The Undertaker , or the formation of the nWo , or the in-ring antics of any divas , or any Wrestlemania moment without a commentary.

You will find yourself missing out on something.

But that was then.

Today, one is forced to ask: Is this art of wrestling commentary fading? Will it soon be a lost art, or is this just a phase?

Sure, legends like Heenan or JR will find no match. But somehow wrestling commentary today, one feels, is just not the same anymore. It has lost its magic.

Even take The King, for example, on Monday Night RAW—the best wrestling show on Television. His eccentricity and naughty charm has made way for a more mature, boring, un-spirited scheme of verbal wordsmithery that no longer entertains anyone but Michael Cole.

Perhaps he can no longer jump up and down squealing “puppies” upon setting eyes on the Divas due to the PG era, or it may be down to his age, but still, there is a lot he can do that he doesn’t.  He has erased almost every bit of that heelish commentator soul within him and has become another corporate commentator.

Michael Cole, Lawler’s broadcast partner, has already received his share of criticism. I guess Jericho does not share his dictionary with Cole, otherwise he would not be addicted to saying “controlled frenzy” and “vintage” and “the longest running episodic…yawn I’m dozing off even writing it!

While Matt Striker has somewhat reintroduced this heelish commentator gimmick, he has a lot of ground to cover.

The TNA pairing of Mike Tenay and Tazz have their moments, and appear more involved in it than their counterparts in the WWE, but to say they have that same magic of the commentators in the past would be delusional.

The truth is, wrestling commentators these days just don’t seem to care enough about the product. They seem to lack motivation, the spirit, the desire to entertain. They come off as boring or worse—forceful. Could one say they have taken the wrestling audience for granted? It is hard to find many, or any, great wrestling commentary moments these days.

There was a time and there were lines that almost gave you goosebumps! There were phrases which now have become classic in wrestling history. There was a vocable magic that was summoned the moment a commentator desired to. Now…there is none.

Is this just a transitional phase? Maybe time needs to be given to some of these young commentators to evolve their own styles and recapture our attention in their art. There is no denying that as wrestling grows in the TV world and looks to engage more, newer, younger audiences, these wrestling commentators—the real hosts of the show for the TV audiences—will play a pivotal role in making the show look compelling.

But do they have what it takes? Will we see a revival of that audible charm that was wrestling commentary once again?

Or is it down to the wrestling action itself? Does the in-ring action offer nothing to stimulate a more sterling commentary?

What do you think?


This article was originally written and published here by myself. FTS sports writing , soon to be launched as The Iron Journal,   is a new endeavor with a bunch of young, talented writers writing high-quality, engaging articles on different sports. Do check it out!