NFLNBANHLMLBWNBAWorld CupTennis
Featured Video
This NFL/World Cup Stat Is Wild 🤯

Supreme Court Declines to Hear 'Redskins' Case

Justice HillNov 16, 2009

The article on The Washington Post website this morning was short, perhaps a dozen or so paragraphs that didn't do anything more than what the headline did. And the headline did plenty in putting the words underneath it into context. 

The eight words in the headline read: "Supreme Court refuses to hear Redskins' naming case."

There, it's done. Native Americans have lost what might be the final fight in their efforts to strip the Washington Redskins of the trademark attached to the team's nickname.

TOP NEWS

Rams Football

Re-Grading Offseason's Biggest Moves 🔠

49ers Seahawks Football

CMC's Crazy Pushups 😮‍💨

Raiders Football

Mendoza’s QB Mt. Rushmore ⛰️

That's no small matter, because if stripped of the trademark, the franchise would have jettisoned this disparaging nickname faster than a stripper peels off clothing. For the team would be unable to market the nickname exclusively, which would allow anybody else to peddle merchandise freely with the team's nickname and logo on it.

In essence, it would make no "cents," as in dollars and cents, for the NFL franchise to keep a nickname that had no commercial or marketing value, despite its public appeal.  

The U.S. Supreme Court made no comment, The Post article said, about its decision not to hear the case, which had wound its way through lower courts since 1992. It then landed in the high court's hands. 

Now what?

This NFL/World Cup Stat Is Wild 🤯

TOP NEWS

Rams Football

Re-Grading Offseason's Biggest Moves 🔠

49ers Seahawks Football

CMC's Crazy Pushups 😮‍💨

Raiders Football

Mendoza’s QB Mt. Rushmore ⛰️

Aiyuk's Latest IG Story

Ravens Steelers Football

Snubs from Top 10 CB Rankings

Shams: Wizards Sign Middleton
Bleacher Report4h

Shams: Wizards Sign Middleton

TRENDING ON B/R