Common Sense: Jack Warner Speaks Out On England and European Issues
Jack Warner is one of the most controversial men in World football. As President of CONCACAF, the federation whose jurisdiction includes North America and the Caribbean, he has a position of power in FIFA as a vice president.
But despite the main remits of his authority lying across the North Atlantic, Warner is regularly found to be voicing his piece on matters in Europe and is always urging UEFA President Michel Platini to lead the world in implementing changes to the game.
His most recent rant came at England’s expense when he stated, with a great degree of certainty, that CONCACAF would not be voting for England’s 2018 World Cup bid. This has been met with much disdain by the FA and many associated with the game in England.
While Warner has almost no right to make his feelings public on this issue or on any other matter that is outside his jurisdiction, the man has a quality that is sorely lacking in the corridors of power in Soho Square, Switzerland, and even in the FIFA presidential office. Common sense.
All too often in the modern game, people at the top are making mistakes, ones which Warner constantly highlights and offers solutions too.
His criticism of England’s World Cup bid is not unfair; at a recent London summit of football’s world leaders, Warner pointed out that there was no promotion of England's bid, yet Qatar and Australia both put their cases forward, through discussions and promotions.
If this was so then the FA has scored a spectacular own goal, surely this was the perfect opportunity to court the very people who will vote on where the World Cup will be staged nine years from now.
The major reason for the sluggishness of the England bid is because the 2012 Olympic Games are being held in London and the FA believes that is proof enough that England is ready to host a major football competition. Wrong.
Warner insists that CONCACAF will vote for the bid which leaves a lasting legacy on a country, mainly at grass roots level, a situation that the English FA struggle with.
The Premier League is a prime example of this, with the top 20 teams in the country not pumping more of their wealth into their youth setups. Most clubs favour buying an up and coming star and finishing the job themselves.
Warner is also an advocate of bringing technology into football, something that the English FA and UEFA are less enthusiastic about introducing.
UEFA have employed a five-official system in this season’s Europa League, which is a stubborn testament to the old ways of refereeing and the English FA would rather talk about a 39th match than bring in video refereeing, which has proved successful in many sports, such as rugby and cricket.
Warner is also passionate about curbing debt culture in the game and said clubs with excessive debts should be banned from playing in Europe and that all European Football Associations must strive to reduce member clubs’ debts to ensure football fulfils its obligations to society.
Granted, sometimes Warner comes up with ideas that seem strange, such as reducing teams to 10 players, enlarging goals, and introducing rugby style sin bins for certain fouls, but he backs this up by pointing out that football has evolved greatly over the centuries and people should not stand in the way of progress.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?