BCS Title Exposed As Irrelevant, Yet Again, Now By Gator-Fan Officials

Reid Brooks by Contributor Written on October 21, 2009
GAINESVILLE, FL - OCTOBER 17: Cornerback Andru Stewart #36 of the Arkansas Razorbacks breaks up a pass to wide receiver Riley Cooper #11 of the Florida Gators October 17, 2009 at Ben Hill Griffin Stadium in Gainesville, Florida.  (Photo by Al Messerschmidt/Getty Images) (Photo by Al Messerschmidt/Getty Images)

So here's the thing in case you haven't been paying attention to college football for the past—I dunno—decade.

People don't like the system or the way it works.  They don't like it because someone is consistently getting the shaft and it ultimately proves nothing.

At the beginning of the season, a group of teams are designated as "the best" and thrown into the top-25 before a single snap takes place.  Then those teams take it upon themselves to play a couple of out-of-conference games against a few record-padders before going into their conference schedule.

The problem with this?

It tells the football world nothing about strength of conference—and therefore strength of schedule.  It is entirely possible that a three-loss team is better than an undefeated team in another conference, but there is no way to prove it.

The system is designed to ultimately revert to record, even though record may say absolutely nothing about which team is better.  And when the season ends, only two teams get a shot at the big title.  How does that make sense?

So this week, as anyone who watched the Florida-Arkansas game over the weekend knows, Florida was handed a victory by the officials.  It was so bad that the crew was just suspended by the SEC for several "phantom" calls against Arkansas on Florida's winning drive.

The appropriate conclusion must be drawn somewhere along the line that Florida would not (not necessarily, could not) have won the game without help from the officials.

And when some calls start coming back as bogus, and you look at the 10 penalties against Arkansas throughout the game—whereas there were only three against Florida—you essentially have to question every call made by that crew.

I'm not much for conspiracy theory, but it is pretty easy to see that the SEC is the biggest benefactor of what happened.  Florida and Alabama meeting as undefeateds in the SEC Championship game could mean two SEC teams in the title game, and certainly means two teams in a BCS bowl game.

If you thought college football was about body paint and alumni reunions, get a grip, because it is a business just like the NFL.

Thats why the players get free educations.  Thats also why the BCS system still exists.

You think these crazy old guys just love their tradition?  They love the money their conference rakes in when they get teams into big money games at the end of the year.  They know the system is broken.

And so does the SEC.

Whether it was intentional or not, I can guarantee you the SEC "Commish" would be on the phone thanking that suspended crew for their service.  Notice they were suspended, not suspended without pay.  They're on vacation drinking martinis in Miami while we're wondering what the hell is going on.

Do I blame Florida?  Not really.

I mean it is pretty obvious that the only just thing for them to do is forfeit the win to declare the game a draw.  It can't be rectified in retroactively, and their program director should take responsibility for the fact that they didn't win.

Everyone else in the country knows it, which is why the AP didn't rank Florida No. 1.

The BCS poll did, showing again that the "computers" know more than everyone.  How does that work?

I learned in third grade that my computer is an impressive machine that does what I tell it to do.  So someone has rigged it for Florida or the SEC to be on top.

This year, I can make a case for six or seven teams to be the best in the country.  A lot of that has to do with the fact that there is no definable "best conference" anymore.

Only two of them will play in the BCS Championship.

You do the math, what does that mean?

It means the BCS proves nothing, satisfies no one, and doesn't belong in college football.  But it won't end until some really, really annoying old people die off.  Or we boycott.  I'll let you choose for yourself.

tick-tock

Vote Now! - Author Poll

Will you honor the validity of the "BCS Champion" as a national champion?

  • Absolutely not, the system is ridiculous.
  • I might if it is my team, but no if it is not.
  • Of course! I love the BCS, it is the perfect system.
vote to see results
Results - Author Poll

Will you honor the validity of the "BCS Champion" as a national champion?

  • Absolutely not, the system is ridiculous.

    60.0%
  • I might if it is my team, but no if it is not.

    21.5%
  • Of course! I love the BCS, it is the perfect system.

    18.5%
  • Total votes: 65
(0)
...
Share This  
Crop_45x45
or to post this comment

28 Comments

There are no comments yet. Get the conversation started by leaving the first comment

Loading more comments...
posted just now
  • Loading...
  • Nobody has liked this comment yet
Cancel

This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete

505
reads

28
comments

written on October 21, 2009 Opinion

The best Arkansas newsletter on the web

Subscribe Now

We will never share your email address


CBS Sports Official Partner
Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Getty Images.
Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Getty Images is strictly prohibited.