NBA Referees Make Calls, Hilarity Ensues!

(Photo by Elsa/Getty Images)

The NBA recently came out with the "NBA Video Rulebook" to help fans better understand the calls that are made by their referees. While the premise was an interesting one, after watching some examples I had to ask myself, "Is this a joke?" The only answer I have is, yes, yes it is.

So, what videos did I watch first? Clearly the technical fouls. I was interested in what was known as a "respect for the game" technical foul.

According to the video rulebook, upon being called for a foul, a player is allowed a "heat of the moment" reaction. This reaction, however, must quickly "dissolve," meaning the player cannot direct his complaint at the official and must stop his complaint more-or-less immediately.

The rulebook provides two examples of "heat of the moment" reactions that dissolve quickly and two examples of "heat of the moment" reactions that do not dissolve quickly. I looked at the ones that do not dissolve, or, ones that lead to a technical foul.

To my utter amazement, both clips show the referee making the wrong call. The first clip was a play in which Earl Watson (of the then Sonics) was being called for a loose ball foul. The referee should have made no call because the contact made by Watson was incidental, which, under NBA rules, is allowed and is not considered a foul.

Yet, the video rulebook offers this explanation as to why it was called a technical: "Here, in response to the foul call, the defensive player, No. 25 in the white uniform, continues to berate the official following his initial expression making comments and gestures in resentment to the foul call. The reaction here extends beyond an initial outburst and earns a Technical Foul."

The second technical foul situation that was used involved Baron Davis. This one is just as comical as the first.

The Web site uses the same explanation as before: "Here, in response to the foul call, the defensive player..."

Okay, fair enough, but it would have benefited the NBA to actually fix some of the errors before putting the site up. Davis was not arguing a foul call. He was arguing the fact that the official made a wrong call on a ball that went out of bounds off a Houston Rocket player.

It clearly shows the Houston defender Rafer Alston as being the last player to touch the ball. According to the rule, that means that the Golden State Warriors should have retained possession.

What's even funnier are the examples of what is referred to as an overt technical foul. Vladimir Radmanovic of the Lakers got a technical for being upset that there was no foul called while he was trying to get a rebound.

Here's the ruling deemed by the NBA on why Radmanovic was given a technical: "While players are allowed Heat of the Moment reactions to calls with which they disagree, a player is never permitted to air punch, wave off or direct any other similar gesture directly at an official. On this play, the offending player air punches directly at the official."

Shaq got a technical for the same reason after being called for a foul, and it clearly was a foul on Shaq who just pushed a New Jersey Nets player after grabbing an offensive rebound.

Kurt Thomas was given a technical for the same reason, except Thomas wasn't trying to disrespect the official. He was letting him know that the ball was slapped out of his hands by Suns player Steve Nash. This is another joke of a call.

Andres Nocioni was given a technical for throwing his mouthpiece into the scorers table after being called for a foul. Yet, the clip doesn't show anything remotely resembling a foul on Nocioni.

Here's the explanation for the technical: "While players are allowed Heat of the Moment reactions to calls with which they disagree, they must regain their composure immediately. On this play, the offending player throws his mouth piece at the scorer's table, several moments after his initial display of anger and following plenty of time to regain his composure. Had the mouth piece been thrown into the stands in a comparable manner, the player would be ejected."

And who's surprised the last clip involves Ron Artest? Not I. The reason why Artest, who was sitting on the bench at the time, was upset was that it's clear as day that as his teammate Shelden Williams was going up to grab an offensive rebound, his arm was held by LaMarcus Aldridge, but no foul was called.

Artest gets up off the bench and starts waving his towel at the official for not making a call on the play.

You're currently logged into Facebook

Do you want to share your Bleacher Report activity on Facebook?