Hey NFL and The Nay-Sayers, Stay Out Of It!

Nelly G. by Contributor Written on October 14, 2009
UNITED STATES - FEBRUARY 10:  Rush Limbaugh during the second round of the AT&T Pebble Beach National Pro-Am on Spyglass Hill Golf Course in Pebble Beach, California on February 10, 2006.  (Photo by Marc Feldman/Getty Images) (Photo by Marc Feldman/Getty Images)

It is official, B/R readers and writers. If you have not heard; the group bidding to buy the St. Louis Rams headed by Dave Checketts has forced out Rush Limbaugh.

A few days ago, the St. Louis Rams' owners Chip Rosenbloom, Lucia Rodriguez, and Stan Kroenke, along with the NFL, came under controversy when they "allowed" a group bidding to buy the Rams' partner with controversial conservative radio-show host Rush Limbaugh.

You may not know why, but in 2003, Limbaugh was a part of ESPN's Sunday NFL Countdown. When Philadelphia Eagles' quarterback Donovan McNabb came up in a conversation, Limbaugh said, "I think what we've had here is a little social concern in the NFL. The media has been very desirous that a black quarterback can do well."

Limbaugh was then forced to resign a few days later.

While I do not have a problem with ESPN forcing Limbaugh to resign after that comment, I do not feel it is right with numerous personalities, including Colts' owner Jim Irsay and the head of the NFL Players Association DeMaurice Smith, trying to block the St. Louis Rams from selling Checketts and Limbaugh the team.

Especially since Limbaugh would only be a minority owner. Checketts would have the controlling stake in the franchise.

I may just feel that it is unjust because a group with Checketts, who owns the St. Louis Blues; and Limbaugh, who is from nearby Cape Girardeau, would most likely keep the franchise in St. Louis. There have been talks of moving the team from St. Louis to a more marketable area—maybe back to Los Angeles or even Mexico City.

St. Louis had two blackouts last year, and it is in danger of a couple more this year. Moving the franchise to a more populated area like L.A. or Mexico City would mean more fans and more money. Which is always the No. 1 concern for almost everybody.

And if you think about it, would you like it if you wanted to go buy something, but someone says no? You would be mad, wouldn't you?

I feel that somebody should be able to buy something if they want, excluding alcohol or drugs, if you are under age.

So please, NFL and the Nay-Sayers, stay out of it!

Vote Now! - Author Poll

Should the NFL be able to control who owns a team?

  • Yes.
  • No.
vote to see results
Results - Author Poll

Should the NFL be able to control who owns a team?

  • Yes.

    62.5%
  • No.

    37.5%
  • Total votes: 8
(0)
...
Share This  
Crop_45x45
or to post this comment

0 Comments

There are no comments yet. Get the conversation started by leaving the first comment

Loading more comments...
posted just now
  • Loading...
  • Nobody has liked this comment yet
Cancel

This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete

41
reads

0
comments

written on October 14, 2009 Opinion

The best Rams newsletter on the web

Subscribe Now

We will never share your email address


CBS Sports Official Partner
Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Getty Images.
Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Getty Images is strictly prohibited.