Why is No One Talking About the Idaho Vandals?

Tobi Writes by Correspondent Written on October 10, 2009
LOS ANGELES, CA - SEPTEMBER 01:   Nathan Enderle #10 of the University of Idaho Vandals looks to pass against the USC Trojans at the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum on September 1, 2007 in Los Angeles, California.  (Photo by Lisa Blumenfeld/Getty Images) (Photo by Lisa Blumenfeld/Getty Images)

I am shocked by the overall lack for press given to Rob Akey's Idaho Vandals for their play this year and the underliying lack of respect.

Not from "football insiders"—ESPN put Idaho vs. a good Colorado State team on TV.  I am talking about a lack of respect from WAC fans, who should know better at this point having seen the team for a few weeks now.

With the WAC despirately trying to prove that Boise is not going to play a cupcake schedule in conference so Boise can maintain their high ranking, one would think that WAC fans would be pushing Idaho after each win.

Maybe they are still mad about having to admit the Vandals... Afterall Idaho was the fat kid no one in the WAC wanted on their team. The WAC didn't want to deal with the black eye of adding a team with the smallest venue at the FBS level --- Idaho's 15,000 seat Kibbie Dome*. 

(*The Kibbie Dome is named after a guy one would have to think of as the patron saint of Idaho football, Bill Kibbie.  Kibbie attended Idaho for only a month before lack of finances forced him into the real world.  He became the head of a contracting company in Utah and in spite of his short time at the university contributed $300,000 of the dome's $1M price tag in 1970.)

Idaho has had a rough decade plus trip to FBS competence. 


Glory Days?

It wasn't always this way for Idaho. Idaho was a member of the Pacific Coast Conference, a precursor to the Pac 10 from 1922 to 1959.  True by the end of that era their smaller budget and conference outlier status caught up to them, bleeding the competitiveness out of their programs, but still, they were affiliated with UCLA and Cal for 37 years!  Who in the WAC can make that claim?

With the collapse of the PCC, Idaho looked for a level of play where their resources would better allow them to compete.  After four years as an independent, Idaho was a founding member of the Big Sky Conference. 

In the late 1980s Idaho emerged as a football power in the conference winning four conference titles in five years and launching a number of big time coaches' careers.  The university began making plans to move up to an FBS conference.

In 1996 Idaho left the Big Sky for the Big West, joining Boise State, UNT, and Cal Poly as replacements for UNLV, Arkansas State, Louisiana Tech, and Southwestern Louisiana (now ULL). 

These additions were seen as too marginal and were too dispersed to save the Big West's football programs leading that conference to drop football in 2000.   Big West football survivors like Idaho faced the tough decision of moving back down to FCS or risking another run as a conference outlier, where travel costs would probably bleed the competitveness out of the program again.


The long walk back

Probably assuming that a move down to the FCS level would be taken as an admission of failure in state and as such would create a huge hurdle for Idaho's state flagship university in a future move to become the FBS school they want to be, Idaho went east to the distant confines of the Sunbelt Conference as a football-only member.

It may have been the right choice, but it would prove to be a brutal move.

There, travel costs and their small stadium further crushed the competitiveness out of their program and damaged their reputation as an FBS school.

But the capricious fingers of fate finally begun to let off Idaho.  A few years earlier, in 1999, fate had begun to poke someone else in the eye for a change.  This time, it would be the WAC. 

In 1999, the eight schools with the best MWC programs and TV markets staged a bloody (and possibly technically illegal) coup.  The WAC was now a two halves of a marginal FBS conference.  There were eight teams spread across a giant footprint where travel costs bled the competitiveness out of all member programs.

Nevada joined in 2000. TCU bailed in 2001.  Boise State and La Tech joined in 2001.

Idaho sat sadly overlooked with each new team recruited.

The SMU, Rice, and Tulsa walked away from the high travel costs of the WAC effective in 2005, forcing the WAC to consider Idaho, Utah State, and New Mexico State.

Despite proximity, USU and NMSU got the invites in 2003.  Idaho was again left in the cold.

Only when TCU's departure from CUSA to the MWC forced CUSA to add UTEP did the WAC finally relent and add Idaho's Vandals of the Kibbie Dome, a move that triggered years of complaints about the bottom three schools not winning and dragging down the conference.


Finally in—time to win?

Single Page
Vote Now! - Author Poll

How many wins do the Vandals roll up this year

  • 11
  • 10
  • 9
  • 8
  • 7
  • 6
  • 5
vote to see results
Results - Author Poll

How many wins do the Vandals roll up this year

  • 11

    11.3%
  • 10

    15.9%
  • 9

    29.4%
  • 8

    28.4%
  • 7

    9.7%
  • 6

    1.9%
  • 5

    3.4%
  • Total votes: 320
(0)
...
Share This  
Crop_45x45
or to post this comment

12 Comments

There are no comments yet. Get the conversation started by leaving the first comment

Loading more comments...
posted just now
  • Loading...
  • Nobody has liked this comment yet
Cancel

This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete

1,444
reads

12
comments

written on October 10, 2009 Opinion

The best newsletter on the web

Subscribe Now

We will never share your email address


CBS Sports Official Partner
Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Getty Images.
Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Getty Images is strictly prohibited.