Chicago Bears Report Card: Week One at Green Bay

Max Kienzler by Analyst Written on September 14, 2009
GREEN BAY, WI - SEPTEMBER 13: Devin Hester #23 of the Chicago Bears reaches out to catch a pass in front of Al Harris #31 of the Green Bay Packers on September 13, 2009 at Lambeau Field in Green Bay, Wisconsin. (Photo by Jonathan Daniel/Getty Images) (Photo by Jonathan Daniel/Getty Images)

First off, let me rant a little..

Remember when I said that this was the first time I was more worried about our defense than our offense? Ya, I am eating those words right now.

Defense played damn good (and screw those ripping on Vasher...Listen, I don't care what CB would have been there: Tillman, Graham, Vasher, or Bowman, you put your corner in a one-on-one situation with one of the top five receivers in the NFC with no over the top help and that is going to happen three out of four times).

CUTLER WHAT THE HELL? LOVIE WHAT THE HELL?

Four interceptions, three in the first half and Lovie...listen, I don't blame him for the failed fake punt. In fact, I don't even care about the fake punt really. It was the ensuing challenge which infuriates me. Obviously, there weren't 12 men on the field so why THE HELL DO YOU BURN ANOTHER TIMEOUT?

And speaking of burning timeouts, Jay Culter burns a timeout on a fourth and inches because he didn't expect the defense to be stacking the line?? Are you f-ing kidding me? What defense did you think they were going to show on a play like that?

Terrible play calling, terrible execution, terrible preparation on the offensive side of the ball.

Seriously, a poor and disappointing opener.

Now, first let me give props to the Green Bay Packers defense. They played very well and forced turnovers.

But this isn't a Packer article, this is grading a Chicago Bears offense that looked lost, scared and confused for most of the game...and the defense who played better than anyone expected.

So here we go, starting with our "vaunted" offense:


Quarterback: D+

Is this harsh? Yes. Do I care? No.

Cutler played well for most of the second half. OK, I said it.

Now, say what you want about the receivers cutting off routes, but Jay threw two passes that SHOULD have been picked off before he threw his first INT. He looked frustrated for the entire first half and threw some terrible passes.

I mean, my brother sent me a text message from Africa, telling me that this was Rex Grossman with low blood sugar. Do you realize how much it costs to send a damn international text message? It ain't cheap.

I mean the only thing our "Savior" did this game was save our receivers from getting hit.

I mean god, the pass that Jolly intercepted was an excellent play by Jolly, but how do you miss a 300 lb lineman blocking your way?

Ugh. I know that this is Jay Cutler. He will have some games where the throws a lot of interceptions. It is just his nature because he takes risks. And this was his first game, against our rival, in their house so the jitters were there... But seriously, this was an awful beginning.

On the plus side, I bet he can't play any worse.

...Ok, now that I got that out of my system, I still believe Jay will be good for us and this was just an inauspicious start.


Running backs: B-

Not Matt Forte's fault. He finished all right, but the line didn't open up much. There was an occasional hole which Forte slashed threw, but it seemed that offensive coordinator Ron Turner forgot he had a running back at times and fell in love with Cutler's arm.

Jason McKie had a drop, but also had a nice catch and run for a first down on a third and three, for whatever that is worth.


Tight Ends: D

Dez Clark looked miserable at times although he had a nice grab on the play he got hurt. He did not seem to run his routes all the way through. And Greg Olsen was a complete ghost for most of the game, although he made a nice block or two at times...you know when the Bears decided to run.


Wide receivers: N/A

Ok, I say N/A because I am giving two grades

Devin Hester: B
Rest of receivers: C

Hester had a nice grab in the first half and a nice 36 yard touchdown catch. He had no drops and was open several other times.

Everyone else...well, Knox had a nice long catch but he seemed to cut off a couple of his routes early (not that I believe it would have made a difference on the INTs) and Earl Bennett did not play as well as I had expected. They weren't terrible, but were by no means good.


Offensive line: C-

Cutler was hurried, hit, and sacked on more than several occasions.

Frank Omiyale did not look all that impressive before he got hurt. Chris Williams and Pace were shaky at times and the line as whole did pretty poorly picking up the Packer blitz. On the few times they did run, it wasn't that successful, especially when running laterally.

This group will have to improve if they want to have a chance in hell in beating the Steelers next week.

Single Page
Vote Now! - Author Poll

What grade would you give the Bears for their performance?

  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • F
vote to see results
Results - Author Poll

What grade would you give the Bears for their performance?

  • A

    5.6%
  • B

    8.3%
  • C

    27.8%
  • D

    27.8%
  • F

    30.6%
  • Total votes: 36
(0)
...
Share This  
Crop_45x45
or to post this comment

0 Comments

There are no comments yet. Get the conversation started by leaving the first comment

Loading more comments...
posted just now
  • Loading...
  • Nobody has liked this comment yet
Cancel

This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete

271
reads

0
comments

written on September 14, 2009 Game Recap

The best Bears newsletter on the web

Subscribe Now

We will never share your email address


CBS Sports Official Partner
Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Getty Images.
Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Getty Images is strictly prohibited.