Sign up or login to track your favorite teams

Sign Up for Bleacher Report

As a registered user you can subscribe to your favorite teams, post comments, write your own articles, and much more.

You must register in order for that functionality to work!








Validating sign up form ...

Bleacher Report articles are written by fans like you

Do you want to cover your favorite sports, teams, and leagues?

Processing writing preferences ...

Great, , you're signed up!

i.e. Big 10, LeBron James, USC Football

Selected Tags:

Logging in ...

While watching last night's Cleveland vs. Texas barn burner, the umpires stirred up the instant replay controversy once again...

MLB: Rekindling the Instant Replay Controversy

by Brandon Heikoop (Columnist)

2

1000 reads

Opinion

May 24, 2008


While watching last night's Cleveland vs. Texas barn burner, the umpires stirred up the instant replay controversy once again.

In this video clip of Ben Francisco's RBI double, you can see what appears to be the ball going over the yellow line in left field. While watching on Sports Time Ohio the commentators did not make it easy to come to one's own decision, but it does appear as though the ball landed on the top of the yellow line.

From MLB.com:

According to the ground rules, the padding atop the outfield rail at Progressive Field is home run territory, but after conferring near third base, the umpires decided the ball didn't hit the top of the yellow padding.

Slow-motion replay, however, showed otherwise.

Thus, the argument for instant replay can again be made.

Comically, MLB.com's Gameday shows that the ball went over the wall in left field. It does not show the ball touching the wallas is the case with the two blue dots to the right.

So if it is obvious that the call was missed and that this has been the case on numerous occasions to this point in the season, what is the hold up?

I am, as previously mentioned, against instant replay.

My thinking is that for every call instant replay fixes and consequently alters, will be wasteful slowing down hundreds of ballgames. The difference between an RBI double and a bases clearing home run will have no factor at the end of the day.

Furthermore, consider how many times a ball is put into play in a game? Maybe between 50 and 60 times? Of that, how many are home runs? On average one or teo? The majority of which are no-doubters.

But how many close plays at first are there? How many near catches in the outfield that are called as a catch when they are "snow-coned?"

Let's take this a step further. How often has a "K Zone" or some other strike zone measurement popped up, only to show you that a called strike was way out of the zone? Or how about the other way around?

Of 300 or so pitches thrown in a game, even with the suggested 94 percent accuracy the umps are sitting at, some 18 pitches are called incorrectly. Is it not a fact that pitches, hitters and defenses change their approach for every instant in a count?

A 2-1 called strike that is actually outside the strike zone has the count sitting at 2-2 instead of 3-1. Now try and tell me that a blown home run call has more influence over a game than a six percent chance of a missed ball or strike.

Track this Article on My B/R
Flag This Article
Share This Article

2 comments Last one added about 1 year ago — Leave a Comment

  1. ...

    Agreed Brandin. I am not for it as well. If it starts here, where will it stop. MLB is currently trying to speed up the game and this would cause unnecessary stops of play. I have always loved the human element to umpiring a game. I am one who believes it will always even out in the end, you get some calls, and you lose some calls. It's just part of the game.

    Edit Comment Cancel

    ...

    Reply
    Great Comment (
    0
    )
    ...
    • ...

      The problem is, proponents of instant replay argue that the meetings between umpires would vanish for home run calls. But like you, I obviously do not see this stopping at home runs alone.

      Edit Comment Cancel

      ...

      Reply
      Great Comment (
      0
      )
      ...

Leave a Comment

  • You must register to post a comment.

  • Want to write for Bleacher Report

    We are a community of fans who write about sports. And we're growing.

    Learn More and Sign Up »



    Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Getty Images.
    Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Getty Images is strictly prohibited.