2009 - $18,000,000 or 13.6% of total team salary
2010 - $18,000,000 Vesting Option or $3 Million Buyout (Read Below)
2011 - $15,000,000 Vesting Option with no buyout
Right off the bat, we arrive at the most interesting salary case on the roster. Magglio is no longer the player he was when this contract looked like a bargain.
Mag's vesting option for 2010 has been widely publicized. With 135 starts, or 540 plate appearances in 2009, the option vests. Also, a combined 270 starts or 1,080 plate appearances over the two season span of 2008 and 2009 will result in the contract vesting.
Basically if he steps to the plate 84 more times this year, the $18 million option for 2010 automatically vests.
Needless to say, paying Ordonez $18 million in 2010 is not something the Tigers are ecstatic about. But what are they to do?
The window to release Magglio shut when he started hitting well in the past few weeks. Releasing him now, even more so than earlier in the season, would certainly result in a grievance filed by his agent Scott Boras, which in all likelihood would cost the Tigers money, though maybe not the full $18 million.
Trading Magglio will not happen, nor will he be claimed on waivers.
The Tigers could go back to benching him, but that too could result in a grievance. Even playing in a platoon, Mags should get close to the required number of plate appearances.
Perhaps the best solution is a convenient disabled list stay? Otherwise, the Tigers will have about 10-15 percent of their 2010 team salary wrapped up in a single player with quickly diminishing skills.
Magglio also has a vesting option for 2011. The option vests in a way similar to his 2010 option. Due to his limited play this season, the Tigers should have no problem limiting his plate appearances to prevent that 2011 option.
5 Comments
Loading more comments...
This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete