Brian: Because it's never to soon to discuss college football. Jeff, The News & Observer's ACC NOW blog predicts another rough season for the ACC. Is the conference headed in the wrong direction for football? And what teams do you look to to change the national perception of ACC football?
Jeff: I hate to say it but I think the reputation of the ACC next year rests on Tommy Bowden and Clemson's shoulders. Clemson is going to get a lot of press preseason with the returning trio of Harper, Spiller and Davis. Add to that another top 5 recruiting class and expectations for Clemson are finally high again on a national level. (Clemson fans think they have a shot at a national championship every year.) If Clemson can put together a 10-2 or 11-1 regular season the ACC will have a team in the top 5 or 10 nationally all year. And the reputation of the league will really depend on whether or not the BCS bowl representative can get a win. And very simply Clemson has the best chance of doing that because of their talent level and Virginia Tech couldn't get it done last year so no reason to think they can this year. If the ACC can't get a BCS win this year, they need one real soon.
Brian: Gah. Typical homer pick from Jeff. What about Boston College? This blog post cites Virginia Tech's 42-11 record since joining the conference and its ability to beat up on the lowly Coastal division. BC has quietly gone 30-9 (16-8) over our first three years in the league. Plus we have to go through the best team in the league every year (Virginia Tech) and miss out on beating down on Duke and North Carolina every year. If BC can put together another ~9-4 season this year, we have to be looked at as one of the premiere teams in the league, no?
Jeff: Brian, that wasn't a homer pick. Clemson is going to be the highest ranked ACC team in the preseason poll this year. The ACC needs to win a BCS game to help the perception of the conference. So I would agree that BC is one of the top teams in the conference since joining the league but a 9-4 record is not taking them to a BCS game and therefore does not really help the national perception of the conference.
Brian: Well, you could have gone the other way and said a resurgence from Miami or Florida State would best help the perception of ACC football and you didn't. I agree that this is the year for Clemson to lose the conference (again), and I'm sure Tommy Bowden will figure out a way to screw it up. And I think the window is closing for Clemson. Looking beyond this year, the only thing that will help change the perception of ACC football is a) ACC teams winning bowl games and b) an about face from both Miami and Florida State. As I have argued before, the ACC doesn't help themselves by not putting the best teams in the best bowls (see: a BC win in the Champs Sports Bowl, a Clemson and Virginia loss in their bowls). And even if Boston College were to go 10-3 or 11-2 the next three years straight, there would still be naysayers about the Eagles and about the conference. The ACC needs Florida State and Miami to be dominant again.
Jeff: Clemson is the conference's best chance THIS year.
Big Finish
Brian: ACC brass and coaches rejected the proposal for a nine-game conference schedule. The current arrangement runs through the 2010-2011 seasons. You surprised?
Jeff: Not at all. It will happen eventually though.
Jeff: 2008 pre-season NIT lineup rumored to be BC, Cornell, St. John's and Loyola (Md.) in the BC site. BC makes it through the opening round and will be playing in the semifinals at the Garden, right?
Brian: Yes, given that lineup I would expect the Eagles to be playing at MSG with me in attendance. If the Eagles can get to NYC, it would be full circle for Tyrese Rice as I saw him at MSG as a freshman against Michigan State in the Jimmy V Classic. He was pretty raw and inexperienced and threw up some ugly 3 point attempts in that game.
Brian: This LSU site condenses all of the meaningless preseason college football polls. ACC teams included are #9 Clemson, t-#16 Virginia Tech, #23 Wake Forest and #27 Florida State. Surprised again no love for a certain football team that finished in the Top 10 last season?
Jeff: No. But notice Clemson is top 10.
Brian: That's because it's May and not November for Tommy's Tigers.
comments (6) write a comment »
write a new comment
4 months ago
Don't rip off PTI please...its fine to do some rapid fire stuff, but mimicking a real sports show is really unoriginal and not creative.
Plus everyone reading knows you took it from PTI, and I am sure you knew that would happen, it just isn't fun to read
from 4 months ago
How are we ripping off PTI? We aren't plagiarizing what they say on their "real sports show." We are merely using their format to blog about a subject that we both love.
If you don't like it, don't read.
If you want to become "a member of the sports media community," you would be best served not disparaging other people's work in my opinion.
from 4 months ago
I think it would read better if you had come up with your own format. People would be more interested in YOUR work rather than thinking about its connection to PTI and so forth.
Also, part of being a member of the sports media community is critiquing other members in order to improve them.
Bill Simmons calls bad broadcasters all the time, maybe they don't listen, or maybe they try to improve. Sports media is essentially a forum for critiquing sports, athletes, coaches, decision-making, and the people who cover them for everyone to read
4 months ago
Hey dickhead, we're just two guys that enjoy BC sports and the show PTI, so thanks for the critcism, but no thanks. I am not trying to be a member of the sports media community so maybe you should try critiquing those who are. Critiquing us is probably just too easy for someone as brilliant as you anyway.
4 months ago
bcinterruption.blogspot.com
4 months ago
Jeff i thought it was an awesome article and i liked the format dont listen to one guy who disagrees ive talked to a few of my friends that loved it
write a new comment