Imagine if all the beer companies got together and decided that none of them would sell any beer for under two dollars and they would not let any new beer companies enter the market. We would all be pretty upset.
The NCAA has done the same thing to college athletes. They have gotten together and agreed that none of them will pay college athletes a dime and they will not compete against any teams that pay athletes. Just as we would have no choice but to drink expensive beer, college athletes have no choice but to go unpaid for 4 years as they generate millions in revenue for their schools.
I say open college sports to the free market. Instead of talking about whether Julio Jones is a five Star or a four Star, we could be talking about whether or not Alabama should offer him 800 thousand dollars or 1 million dollars.
The current system forces football players to make a huge bet on their athletic ability. They bet that if they work hard with no pay for four years they will get a guaranteed 250 thousand dollar salary. They either get zero dollars or 250 thousand dollars, or more.
A free market would allow players to still make good money even if they don’t have NFL talent or if they get hurt before their Junior/ Senior year.
That’s enough of a reason to pay college athletes for me but I’ve gone ahead and examined some counter arguments.
But, They get Paid with Free Tuition?
Students pay 100 thousand dollars to go to college for four years, so if you let an athlete go to college, that’s like giving them 100 thousand dollars. Right? Wrong.
If you give me 100 thousand dollars worth of cat food, that’s not like giving me $100,000. Most athletes would never pay 100 thousand dollars for school just as I would never spend 100 thousand on cat food.
For a variety of reasons, a college education is worth far less to college athletes than it is to normal students. Normal students prepare themselves for college in high school and work hard in college, in order to get a good job.
Today's Must Reads
Athletes, generally speaking, are extremely unprepared for the college course work expected of normal students. With the help of an army of tutors they can merely try to stay eligible.
There’s no reason for them to try to complete the work they are unprepared for anyways because it has nothing to do with their career aspirations. A financial consultant will depend on what they learned in college accounting classes to succeed. A cornerback will not rely on what they learned in sociology class to break up a pass.
Hell, Vince Young reportedly got a 6 on the Wonderlic exam and was still drafted third. A score of 10 is supposed to indicate literacy.
It Would Ruin the Tradition and School Spirit of College Sports?
Paying college athletes would just give each college a pro team that would have no connection to the student body, goes the argument. Let's stop pretending college athletes are like normal students.
Anyone who’s gone to a big sports school understands this. Athletes sit together in packs in the back of classrooms isolated from everyone else.
They don’t study at night in the libraries so they get good grades so they can get good jobs. They have tutors prepare their work for them and make sure they study enough to stay eligible.
When students are vomiting after too many Natty Lights on a Thursday night, athletes are vomiting after too many wind sprints. I don’t feel any more attachment to the athletes on my college’s teams than I do to with the athletes on pro teams I root for.
I love my college football team because I spent four of the best years of my life going to all the home games and cheering with my friends; not because our back up QB occasionally made appearances in my Psych class.
Paying Athletes Would Remove Parity from College Sports?
If anything, paying college athletes would increase parity. Over the last few years we have seen scores of players eschew Midwestern schools for USC or SEC schools because of the warm weather. Relatively trivial matters, like weather, would no longer give certain schools a huge advantage if players were getting paid.
Recruiting would become a much more honest and transparent affair. Florida would stop winning recruits on account of Urban Meyer befriending their girlfriends. Paying athletes would also allow nontraditional football schools to quickly develop programs.
If Harvard decided they wanted to compete with LSU, they could spend the money and get it done. The only schools that would be harmed would be schools that are neither wealthy nor have strong community or alumni support for football.
But, if a school and its fan base do not want to spend money on their team, do they really deserve a competitive team?
There’s not enough money to pay College Athletes?
People like to point out that many college athletic departments lose money, and they assume there would be no money to pay athletes with. They forget that men’s basketball and football subsidize every other sport. Without football there would be no money to pay for women’s gymnastics.
If college football players were paid, it’s possible that there would not be enough money for women’s gymnastics. But, is there really a problem with that? Why should students pay more for tuition so that a team can exist that impacts almost no one besides those on the team?
Across the nation, college students play club hockey, lacrosse, and rugby. Sports like women’s gymnastics could be relegated to club status where they would have to raise their own money like any other student organization that doesn’t profit the university.
comments (10) write a comment »
write a new comment
3 months ago
You're sure to steps on a lot of toes with this article. I enjoyed reading it and look forward to the comments it will surely generate.
3 months ago
liked it until the end about the other sports thing. Don't people from the gymnastics programs at college go on to compete at the olympics? That's more than a second rate college football player will ever do. What after gymnastics, diving, athletics, soccer? All of which have people who go on to compete at the highest level. I'm not saying schools having to drop a program is bad, in fact it would force schools to specialise and make it a higher level of talent competing. But to dismiss anything that isn't football or basketball is pretty dumb
I think pay them but set a cap. Not ridiculously high either. You know like the top players could earn around $100,000 a year. Then if they are really good enough they can go earn the big dollars in the pro's. Want to hurt a team who are breaking the rules? reduce their cap not their schollarships....that would be interesting
3 months ago
1. Complaining about not getting cash equivalents of scholarships is basically complaining about athletes having to attend college in the first place. If they're going to be in college, the money to pay for college has to come from somewhere. It counts.
Also, Vince Young blew off the Wonderlic test and got a 6. When he retook it and tried, he did better.
2. If the NCAA adopted a pay-for-play scheme, the pay would have to be the same across the board to prevent big money schools from simply outpaying the less-wealthy schools. In that case, the payment is a wash and nothing about the recruiting process changes. And no, climate is not trivial.
3. Title IX says you can't just cancel women's sports in order to pay football and basketball players.
3 months ago
If only there was some large source of revenue, derived from major college sports, that the NCAA could divide among all the schools...Hmmm.
Damn! It's a quandary! I'm gonna go watch some Big Ten Network and think it over...
3 months ago
WOW. I tried counting the ways in which this article was utterly retarded, but I stopped caring after 172,329.
I think my favorite stupid excerpt has got to be this:
"For a variety of reasons, a college education is worth far less to college athletes than it is to normal students. Normal students prepare themselves for college in high school and work hard in college, in order to get a good job.Athletes, generally speaking, are extremely unprepared for the college course work expected of normal students. With the help of an army of tutors they can merely try to stay eligible.There’s no reason for them to try to complete the work they are unprepared for anyways because it has nothing to do with their career aspirations. A financial consultant will depend on what they learned in college accounting classes to succeed. A cornerback will not rely on what they learned in sociology class to break up a pass."
You've seen the commercial, right? Come on, we've all seen the commercial where they state that 98% of all NCAA athletes go on to be professionals in something other than sports. You know why it's a good commercial? Because it's TRUE, you retard. Athletes, GENERALLY SPEAKING, have career aspirations outside of being a professional athlete. You've got to be the DUMBEST writer on this site to have written this ridiculous article.
3 months ago
I love how everyone thinks that universities make "millions" off their athletic programs. All these ideas turn college sports into a 10 team league. Destroying tradition and excitement.
3 months ago
For real Dustin - I truly think that people out there believe that colleges are for-profit enterprises when they aren't.
from 3 months ago
Exactly. A colleges main goal isn't athletic programs. If it does make money on its program then it should be placed into research, labs, etc. This is where scientific and medical research happens. We depend on these types of things to advance as a civilization. People also forget that there are salaries for coaches, athletic directors, and public relations within the program that need to be paid. This does not come completely from tuitions.
Sports attract students to the university. Most students do not want to go to a college where they they can't root for a team. It's part of the excitement. I know I didn't.
3 months ago
Wait a minute. Are we seriously considering paying these kids to play basketball? Can't be. I laughed all the way through this article. Hard. There were tears. My favorite line: "There’s no reason for them to try to complete the work they are unprepared for anyways because it has nothing to do with their career aspirations. "
from 3 months ago
Hrmm, so what happens to 99% of college athletes that do not play professionally? I agree with Moe - you can't classify all athletes as dumb jocks, some of them actually want/need the education and while involvement in college athletics is a great experience, many have no aspirations to play beyond college.
write a new comment