Sign up for our New York Rangers newsletter:
Subscribe
Thanks for signing up. You can sign up for more teams by clicking .

New York Rangers: A Realistic Evaluation

Guy Barton by Contributor Written on July 26, 2009
NEW YORK - APRIL 26: Henrik Lundqvist #30 of the New York Rangers skates out to face the Washington Capitals in Game Six of the Eastern Conference Quarterfinal Round of the 2009 NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs at Madison Square Garden on April 26, 2009 in New York City. The Capitals defeated the Rangers 5-3.  (Photo by Bruce Bennett/Getty Images) (Photo by Bruce Bennett/Getty Images)

The New York Rangers of recent years have been an amalgam of very talented players, high reputation players that haven't lived up to expectations, your average player, and very promising youngsters.   

This year's Rangers, I reckon, have taken a step forward.  Now, I am a Rangers fan but will be first to admit that they aren't and haven't been cup contenders for years.  The team has been hyped up way too much and was therefore bound to be open for scrutiny. 

The team have the building blocks for success for sure though.  Henrik Lundqvist is truly a world class goaltender who has kept the Rangers in countless games and is the keystone of the franchise. 

The defence has a very quickly maturing Marc Staal, who will be one day one of the top shut down defenders, Dan Girardi who is a very underated but reliable and can provide some offence and three prospects who are all rated as top four d-men in the form of Bobby Sanguinetti, Michael Del Zotto, and the newly acquired Ryan McDonagh. 

The offence has Brandon Dubinsky and Ryan Callahan who although won't be leading the league in points, but do provide good numbers and more importantly the intangibles.  One of these two will be captain after Drury if they remain Rangers. 

Evgeny Grachev and Artem Anisimov have good futures ahead of them and both have a shot at training camp with Anisimov likely to get the fourth line role. 

The Rangers have a good crop of veterans to help the youngsters progress, however, unfortunately many of them have been sorely overpaid and that has hurt the team.  Chris Drury, Wade Redden, Michal Rozsival and the now departed Scott Gomez are seriously overpaid. 

That doesn't take away the fact though that they are good players, but expectations were set far too high.  The Redden deal is probably the worst here simply because of the length and the the fact that his skills and points production were declining way to quickly to warrant that deal, but hey we do have Glen Sather running the team. 

But Drury and Rozsival are not bad players and to a lesser extent Redden.  The problem is they are second/third line players being paid like superstars.

Now getting rid of Gomer was a great deal, particularly because we acquired a Rangers fan in Higgins who is a solid second line player and the highly rated McDonagh who was taken 12th back in 2007. 

I actually cheered with delight when I saw that because it freed up the cap space we desperately needed.  My instant thought when reading it was we're going after either Marian Gaborik or Vinny Lecavalier. 

The Gaborik deal as it turned out, five years $7.5 million a year, is a high risk deal but also a high reward deal.  If, and that's a monumental if no matter what doctors and Gaborik himself say, he stays healthy is a top player in the league and can be the player we've needed since Jaromir Jagr. 

He has put up very good numbers, 219 goals and 437 points in 502 games.  The problem is the games played statistic.  Brad Richards debuted the same year as Gaborik and his statistics are 548 points in 620 games. 

That's 118 games that Gaborik has missed.  Richards is an incredibly durable player, he only missed a maximum of two games each of his seasons until this year, but that's still more than a season that Gaborik has missed through not just a recurring injury but more worryingly several injuries. 

He has had a dodgy groin, a back injury and most recently a bum hip which limited him to 17 games last season.  Having said all of that I hope and cross my fingers that he finally can have a clean bill of health and put up some big numbers, if he does I'm sure he'll quickly become a fan favourite and I'll certainly be getting a Gaborik No. 10 jersey. 

If not, we have another tough contract to deal with.

Unless we make a blockbuster trade to acquire a first line center, such as Richards or Lecavalier; something that I can't see happening and would mean we would have to give up a great deal in talent like Dubinsky and one of the three defensive prospects or Staal and if that's the case, then I'd rather stick with what we've got; Dubinsky will probably be the man to go to. 

Drury is a long shot particularly now that Kotalik has signed and they had good chemistry in Buffalo.  I'm all for that.  Dubinsky will either step up in a big way or the most likely event he will continue his progress and growth as a player. 

Zherdev is all but gone, which I'm sorry about.  He is infuriating but he does have a great talent, he for some reason can't be bothered.  If we could bring him back for the same money then I'd take that but any more and we should let him go, its a shame we'll get nothing for him though if he does go.

I can imagine there being a team out there willing to take a chance on him, maybe the Panthers or Oilers.

Its a shame that Paul Mara, Freddie Sjostrom and Blair Betts, as of this moment, have left but I'm sure players will step up in to the gaps left.  Chris Chelios and Brendan Shanahan have been linked recently and I've read a great deal anti any such moves.  I would actually like those two on the roster. 

Chelios would be a perfect seventh d-man who can play 40 games, but more importantly he is a brilliant influence and leader to have on the team, something we lacked last year.   With these young d-men coming through he would be a great mentor. 

Shanny was one of my favourite Rangers and if we can get him cheaply lets have him.  Again hes a good influence and leader and would be beneficial to the club.

So really the Rangers are a very different looking team this year and I doubt they'll win the cup but they should make the playoffs. 

With the roster now fairly shored up for the next few years the team should and hopefully start to gel and the youngsters can come through and take some of the strain and hopefully shine.  But heck, with Sather in charge the team might look completely different in a month.

(0)
...
Share This  
Vote Now! - Author Poll

Is this season's Rangers roster an improvement on last year?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Pretty much the same
vote to see results
Results - Author Poll

Is this season's Rangers roster an improvement on last year?

  • Yes

    67.6%
  • No

    18.9%
  • Pretty much the same

    13.5%
  • Total votes: 37
Crop_45x45
or to post this comment

11 Comments

There are no comments yet. Get the conversation started by leaving the first comment

Loading more comments...
posted just now
  • Loading...
  • Nobody has liked this comment yet
Cancel

This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete

442
reads

11
comments

written on July 26, 2009 Opinion

Top Stories from NHL.com

NHL on B/R | Official Partners

The best Rangers newsletter on the web

Subscribe Now

We will never share your email address


CBS Sports Official Partner
Certain photos copyright © 2010 by Getty Images.
Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Getty Images is strictly prohibited.