Cain Is Able: Why Matt Cain Should Start The All-Star Game

Jordan Jurkowitz by Scribe Written on July 05, 2009
SAN FRANCISCO - MAY 17: Matt Cain #18 of the San Francisco Giants pitches against the New York Mets during a Major League Baseball game on May17, 2009 at AT&T Park in San Francisco, California. (Photo by Jed Jacobsohn/Getty Images) (Photo by Jed Jacobsohn/Getty Images)

All-Star rosters were revealed Sunday morning. It should surprise no one that the two representatives from the San Francisco Giants are pitchers Tim Lincecum and Matt Cain.

 

One of them should be given the honor of starting for the National League.

 

And it should be Matt Cain.

 

Yes, Lincecum is the reigning National League Cy Young winner. And yes, he has picked up right where he left off last season. As of July 5, he led the major leagues with 141 strikeouts and was third in ERA at 2.23. He also has an on-going streak of 23 innings without allowing a run (a streak which includes 18 in a row without letting a base runner past second base), and is 9-2 for a Giants team that has been one of the biggest surprises of the 2009 season.

 

But Cain is also 9-2, and as of July 5, he was fourth in the majors with a 2.48 ERA. While his strikeout total of 88 isn’t nearly as flashy as Lincecum's, and his ERA is slightly worse than fellow All-Star Dan Haren of the Diamondbacks, Cain is more deserving of the honor of starting the game.

 

Why?

 

Because up until this season, Matt Cain was the best pitcher in the game today who the average baseball fan had never heard of. In the 2007 and 2008 seasons, Cain posted a combined ERA of 3.71. Opponents hit only .222 against him in 2006, the third lowest batting average against in the NL that season. His 217 and 2/3 innings pitched last season ranked fifth in the National League.

 

Unfortunately, Cain did all of this for a Giants team whose batting order was about as scary as a cheesy haunted house at a traveling carnival. His combined win-loss record in 2007 and 2008 was an unimpressive 15-30, largely due to getting some of the worst run support in baseball. In 2007, he received just 78 runs of support during his 32 starts from the Giants "offense." In 2008, the support was even worse, as he got only 76 runs of support during his 34 starts. He received two fewer runs of support than the year before despite pitching 17 2/3 more innings.

 

To put it bluntly, Matt Cain has been the unluckiest pitcher in baseball for most of the last three years.

 

Single Page
(0)
...
Share This  
Crop_45x45
or to post this comment

2 Comments

There are no comments yet. Get the conversation started by leaving the first comment

Loading more comments...
posted just now
  • Loading...
  • Nobody has liked this comment yet
Cancel

This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete

70
reads

2
comments

written on July 05, 2009 Opinion

The best Giants newsletter on the web

Subscribe Now

We will never share your email address


CBS Sports Official Partner
Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Getty Images.
Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Getty Images is strictly prohibited.