Kevin Millwood All-Star Snub Inexcusable

Bo Reed by Correspondent Written on July 05, 2009
ARLINGTON, TX - JULY 1:  Pitcher Kevin Millwood #33 of the Texas Rangers throws against the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim at Rangers Ballpark July 1, 2009 in Arlington, Texas.  (Photo by Ronald Martinez/Getty Images) (Photo by Ronald Martinez/Getty Images)

Every season at this time, baseball fans everywhere are frustrated with the All-Star selections. This is an annual part of the season that never changes, but snubbing Kevin Millwood is inexcusable.

 

Pitching in a stadium that doubles as a launching pad and an oven, Millwood has been more than good in the first half. He’s been dominating for a team that isn’t exactly used to dominating pitchers.

 

He’s taken the ball every five days, pitched into the sixth and seventh innings on a regular basis, lost games he would have won with a little offense and single-handedly kept the Rangers from prolonging losing streaks on multiple occasions.

 

He has in every sense of the word been an “ace.”

 

Yet, he’ll be home watching an All-Star team featuring the usual Boston gods of baseball, at least the media and their fans think so anyway.

 

Josh Beckett sports an ERA of 3.67 compared to Millwood’s 2.80. Beckett has pitched 105.1 innings compared to Millwood’s 119.

 

Tim Wakefield has an ERA of 4.30, yet his ticket has been punched for St. Louis ahead of Millwood. I must be crazy, but I think an ERA of 2.80 is better than 4.30. Maybe I’m just in a parallel universe where those deserving to be All-Stars are actually chosen to represent their team and their league.

 

Inexcusable.

 

Criminal.

 

Now, like I said earlier, this kind of thing happens every year. What makes this not only unfair, but completely ridiculous, is the manager of the AL team and the players in the AL are the ones who select the pitching staff.

 

How can anyone explain the exclusion of Kevin Millwood? Simple, you can’t, which is what makes it easily the worst of the 2009 All-Star snubs.

 

Another question that needs to be answered is this: With the winner determining home field advantage in the Fall Classic, wouldn’t each manager want the best team for the game?

 

Oh I forgot it can’t be an All-Star team without the Red Sox and their “dominating” pitching staff, especially with Wakefield and that 4.30 ERA. Don’t get me wrong, Beckett is absolutely worthy of his selection, but Wakefield? Are you kidding?

 

At least Millwood will be rested for the second half.

(0)
...
Share This  
Vote Now! - Author Poll

Should Kevin Millwood Have Been an All-Star

  • Yes, 2.80 ERA In That Ballpark Is Remarkable
  • No, A Rangers Pitcher In The All-Star Game? You Can't be Serious.
vote to see results
Results - Author Poll

Should Kevin Millwood Have Been an All-Star

  • Yes, 2.80 ERA In That Ballpark Is Remarkable

    85.2%
  • No, A Rangers Pitcher In The All-Star Game? You Can't be Serious.

    14.8%
  • Total votes: 27
Crop_45x45
or to post this comment

13 Comments

There are no comments yet. Get the conversation started by leaving the first comment

Loading more comments...
posted just now
  • Loading...
  • Nobody has liked this comment yet
Cancel

This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete

158
reads

13
comments

written on July 05, 2009 Opinion

The best Rangers newsletter on the web

Subscribe Now

We will never share your email address