Shaqs Motto " Win a Ring For The King" Really?
At the Press Confrence today introducing Shaq has a Cavalier Shaq said my motto for the year is "win a ring for the king".Watching it i laughed and was in disbelieve.Right Before that statement he said "Lebron James is up there with Tim Duncan has the most intelligent players in the Nba".
Its almost pathetic what Shaq is doing. He is bouncing around team to team looking for the cheapest ring he can get.The fact that Kobe won his forth ring this year and has a great chance of winning 5-6 with that Lakers team i think Shaq is desperate.What he is doing is know better then what Favre is doing.Except Farve doesnt try to follow and add himself to the hottest team in the league!
We all know Hate or Love Kobe Bryant.That he Has one of the highest basketball I.Q.s in the Nba.I think that was the first cheap shot thrown Kobes way from the Cavs Shaquille O'Niel. When are we going to stop making it ok for Shaquille O'Niel to bounce around for a championship..We all know Shaq says the right things when he has too..Saying he isnt there to demanding shots and he is ok with a couple dump downs and offense put-backs. We know that isnt true. The First time Lebron dribbles the shot clock down to 4 second and jacks up a 25 footer while Shaq has his hands up with Tyrus Thomas on his back thiers gonan be a problem!
Lebron James is an Amazing player.Maybe going to be the Greatest of All Time. But teaming him up with a Center that isnt all that mobile and lives in the lane where Lebron James gets most of his point.That isnt going to keep Lebron in Cleveland or win a ring! A Slasher with a jumper like a Andre Igudala or Amare Stoudimire Would win them a ring! the Over under on the Lebron Shaq confrontation is Feb 14! End Result Cavs win 55-60 games in the weak East.Cavs lose to the Magic or Celtics in the second round.Lebron James become a Free Agent 2010.Then Shaq trys to squirm himself back on the Lakers!
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?