The Five Biggest Misconceptions in NBA History

Marcel  Mansour by Columnist Written on June 13, 2009
ATLANTA  - JANUARY 21:  Scottie Pippen #33 of the Chicago Bulls shoots a free throw during the game against the Atlanta Hawks at Philips Arena on January 21, 2004 in Atlanta, Georgia.  The Hawks won 97-87.  NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and/or using this Photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement.(Photo by: Jamie Squire/Getty Images) (Photo by: Jamie Squire/Getty Images)

5. Bill Russell Being Better Than Wilt Chamberlain

Nearly every time I look at an all-time centers list or an all-time players list, I see Bill Russell being put ahead of the great Wilt Chamberlain.

I completely disagree with that belief. Russell was better than Wilt in only one category: the record 11 rings compared to just two rings for Wilt. 

Wilt was a much better offensive player (Russell never averaged 19 points per game for a season, while Wilt's career scoring average was 30.1), an equal rebounder and defender, a better passer (he even led the league in assists once) and a much more efficient player shooting 54 percent from the field while Russell shot a bad 44 percent.

Russell was just fortunate to have Hall of Famers John Havlicek, Bob Cousy, Sam Jones, K.C. Jones, Frank Ramsey, Tom Heinsohn, Bill Sharman, Bailey Howell, and Clyde Lovellette.

For every season of Russell's career, he had at least three other Hall of Famers with him and in two seasons he had as much as seven with him.

Had it not been for the Hall of Fame-filled Celtics, Wilt would've won many more rings and would be a unanimous pick for the greatest player of all time. 

 

4. The Celtics Being A Better Franchise Than The Lakers

Most of the people in the basketball world consider the Celtics to be the best NBA franchise ever, but that is absurd as the Lakers have been more successful.

The Lakers will have two less titles in a few days after they win number 15, but they have been much more consistent than the Celtics, who dominated in really just two eras: the 60's and 80's (the Lakers were dominant during the 50's, great during the 60's, good in the 70's, legendary in the 80's, solid in the 90's and great in this decade).

Also, the Lakers have more wins, a much higher winning percentage, more conference titles and many more playoff appearances than the Celtics do as well as having arguably eight of the 25 greatest players ever in Magic, Kareem, Wilt, Shaq, Kobe, Baylor, West and Mikan, while the Celtics have three in Russell, Bird and Havlicek.

Finally, the Lakers are the most popular NBA franchise, even with commissioner David Stern saying that his dream Finals matchup would be the Lakers vs. the Lakers. 

Single Page
Vote Now! - Author Poll

Who is better between the first two misconceptions on the list?

  • Russell & Celtics
  • Russell & Lakers
  • Chamberlain & Lakers
  • Chamberlain & Celtics
vote to see results
Results - Author Poll

Who is better between the first two misconceptions on the list?

  • Russell & Celtics

    14.8%
  • Russell & Lakers

    14.8%
  • Chamberlain & Lakers

    59.3%
  • Chamberlain & Celtics

    11.1%
  • Total votes: 27
(4)
...
Share This  
Crop_45x45
or to post this comment

103 Comments

There are no comments yet. Get the conversation started by leaving the first comment

Loading more comments...
posted just now
  • Loading...
  • Nobody has liked this comment yet
Cancel

This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete

824
reads

103
comments

written on June 13, 2009 Opinion

The best newsletter on the web

Subscribe Now

We will never share your email address


CBS Sports Official Partner
Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Getty Images.
Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Getty Images is strictly prohibited.