Ross Cockrell NFL Draft 2014: Highlights, Scouting Report for Buffalo Bills CB

Ross Cockrell, CB, Duke (HT: 6’0”; WT: 191 lbs)

Buffalo Bills

Fourth Round: 109th Pick

NFL Comparison: Greg Toler, CB, Indianapolis Colts

Height	Weight	Arm	Hand
6000	191	29 7/8"	9"

40-yard dash	10-yard split	Vert	Broad	3-Cone	Shuttle
4.43	N/A	36.5"	10' 2"	7.28	4.32

Positives

• Lanky defender with a lot of room to add muscle to his frame if need be.
• Good height, but really plays to his size; doesn't back down to bigger receivers.
• Has a feisty, chippy attitude on the field that is contagious to others.
• Solid athlete who can play in either man or zone coverage without being at a big disadvantage.
• Distance speed is a plus, although zone defenses don’t stress the importance as much.
• Above-average closing burst towards the ball led to many defensed passes. There is potential to become better in this area, and those knockdowns could become turnovers.
• Has a good feel for baiting the quarterback to throw the ball, and uses instincts to jump routes.
• Stays on the hip of receivers well, and uses subtle technique to keep the receiver from catching the ball; there’s a fine line between good technique and being sloppy, and being sloppy leads to penalties.
• Recognizes plays well, then attacks correctly more often than not.
• Faced many pro-style offenses in the ACC, which could lower the difficulty of transition between college football and the NFL.
• Good hip fluidity helps versatility projection at the next level. He isn’t limited to zone due to poor hips.
• Able to mirror receivers and save movement by not falling for head fakes or false steps.

Negatives

• Despite fitting the profile of a zone cornerback, he struggled the most in Cover 3, where he would often stay too strict to his zone and allow nearby seam receivers to catch chunk passes.
• Will likely draw his share of penalties while in coverage. He grabs and holds over the middle when his lack of lateral explosion is vulnerable.
• He’s not a great athlete; features good physical attributes but doesn’t have that extra explosion that top prospects have.
• Doesn’t provide much in run defense, as the receiver often washes him out of the play. He doesn’t maintain lane integrity or dictate where the runner goes.
• Will keep his eyes off of the ball and locked onto the receiver when he transitions to run deep with a receiver. This leads to easier jump balls for the target and less turnover chances.

Year	Team	Tackles	PD	INT
2010	Duke	60	10	3
2011	Duke	56	10	1
2012	Duke	71	18	5
2013	Duke	46	12	3

Personal Notes

• Was ranked as the 76th best cornerback coming out of high school.
• Father Keith Cockrell played football at Columbia University.
• Already graduated from Duke University with a degree in political science, and is currently pursuing a masters degree in political science.

Ratings Chart

Graph made by http://nces.ed.gov

Overall

Cockrell didn’t come from a big-time, powerhouse team, but he held his own without much help against some of the nations’ top receivers. Being able to play in any coverage scheme, Cockrell could develop into a reliable starting cornerback in time. His technique against defending the run will need significant development, but his effort is there, and that’s half the battle.

Draft Projection: Third Round