NCAA Tournament logoNCAA Tournament

NCAA Sweet 16: Betting Breakdown of Returning Teams

Marc LawrenceContributor IIIMarch 27, 2013

With the 2013 NCAA tournament entering the Sweet 16 round, let’s take a different perspective in analyzing the teams that have arrived.  This one pertains specifically to teams that are returning to the Sweet 16 for the second straight year. 

Do these experienced teams perform with aplomb and panache, or do they bomb?  Let’s take a peek.

 

All Hands on Deck

Taking a look at this year’s list of returnees, we find half of last year’s field returning.  They include: Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Louisville, Marquette, Michigan State, Ohio State and Syracuse.

According to our database at Playbook.com, since 1992, teams making a back-to-back appearances in the Sweet 16 are 63-43 SU and 48-56-2 ATS in this round of the tourney.

The cut-line, however, is often times the point spread. 

That’s confirmed by the fact that favorites of more than six points are 35-3 SU and 23-15 ATS in these games. 

Priced at anything less (dog or favorite of six or fewer points), they dip drastically to 28-40 SU and 25-41-2 ATS in competitive contests.

This year’s teams making the cut (favored by six or more points) are Florida and Louisville.

 

 

Not Quite A ‘10’

Looking at it from a varied perspective, Sweet 16 returnees seem to struggle when arriving off a win of less than 10 points, going just 25-24 SU and 17-30-2 ATS.  

This year, that would include Marquette and Ohio State.

Note: Indiana and Syracuse face one another.

 

Seedy Development

As expected, the top two seeds fare the best in Sweet 16 games as returnees, going 48-15 SU combined.  To the spread, however, they are lukewarm—at best—going 32-31 ATS.

No. 3 seeds have fared the worst, going 5-7 SU and 3-9 ATS as returnees in this round.  That is not good news for Marquette or Michigan State.

Ironically, the Golden Eagles failed in this same role as small favorites, losing 68-58 to Florida.

 

Sayonara

 

 

Worse, when Sweet 16 returnees arrive and are forced to take on top quality foe with a win percentage of .850 or greater they spring a major leak, going 7-16 SU and 8-14-1 ATS, including 4-14 SU and 4-13-1 ATS in they won fewer than 30 games last season.

 If these same guys are facing a foe off a win of 15 or more points they capsize, going 0-7 SU and 1-6 ATS.

The life rafts are ready and standing by for Michigan State this Friday.

The bottom line is you can draw your own conclusions, if you like.  But make no mistake, when it comes to handicapping teams in the Sweet 16, the winners will likely be the better-qualified teams that have "been there and done that."  Or those who know how to keep a ship afloat, if you know what I mean.

Where can I comment?

Stay on your game

Latest news, insights, and forecasts on your teams across leagues.

Choose Teams
Get it on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Real-time news for your teams right on your mobile device.

Download
Copyright © 2017 Bleacher Report, Inc. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. All Rights Reserved. BleacherReport.com is part of Bleacher Report – Turner Sports Network, part of the Turner Sports and Entertainment Network. Certain photos copyright © 2017 Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Getty Images is strictly prohibited. AdChoices