Anti-Trust Lawsuit Against BCS Moves Forward

Jeremy by Senior Writer Written on April 03, 2009
MIAMI - JANUARY 08:  Brandon Spikes #51 of the Florida Gators celebrate with the trophy after defeating the Oklahoma Sooners in the FedEx BCS National Championship Game at Dolphin Stadium on January 8, 2009 in Miami, Florida. The Gators won the game by a score of 24-14.  (Photo by Eliot J. Schechter/Getty Images) (Photo by Eliot J. Schechter/Getty Images)

The march to inclusion is heating up as Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff is gathering contracts, statistics, economic data, and experts, expecting to be able to file suit against the BCS in June.

Shurtleff is attempting to prove the BCS is behaving in anti-trust activities, by not allowing all schools a legitimate shot at the national title.

A few years back, the BCS caved to political pressure to allow for more access, which in turn lead to five BCS bowl games. This allowed any non-BCS school a bid if they are ranked in the top 12; previously it was top six. 

Only the 2004 Utah team made the original requirements, but with the change Boise State, Hawaii, and Utah made a BCS game.

“From the very first kickoff of the college football season, the BCS uses its monopoly powers to put more than half of the schools at a disadvantage,” Shurtleff said. His investigation comes after an undefeated University of Utah team was relegated to the Sugar Bowl in January with no chance to play for a national championship.

For this lawsuit to succeed, it must be able to prove that the BCS has total control of the postseason bowl games, and that it uses its control to benefit some conferences and schools over others.

Some law experts feel this lawsuit has some teeth, because there are different restrictions if you are not part of any of the current six automatic qualifier leagues or are Notre Dame.

“There is no doubt that the BCS is a near monopoly,” said Andrew Zimbalist, a professor of economics at Smith College who has focused his research on sports monopolies. “There is no doubt that it uses its power to make unequal payoffs to conferences and schools. There is a good case to be made.”If the lawsuit is successful, the BCS could face court orders requiring it to mend its ways and pay triple damages to states and universities harmed by the BCS, as well as their legal fees.  “

This is on the most extreme end because it could include the three schools and states that made the BCS—Boise State, Hawaii, and Utah—or it could just be Utah because of their success in 2008 where they were the only undefeated team in major college football. 

The litigation is not set until June when Shurtleff will file in Colorado Springs as he gathers more information, and he hopes to have other states to join the party to bring more weight to the table. 

The key to possibly winning this is by filing in Colorado Springs, and not say Eugene, Austin, Miami, or insert any other big-time college town.

 

Single Page
Vote Now! - Author Poll

Is the BCS Breaking Anti-Trust Laws

  • Yes
  • No
  • I hope so, I want a playoff
vote to see results
Results - Author Poll

Is the BCS Breaking Anti-Trust Laws

  • Yes

    51.5%
  • No

    6.1%
  • I hope so, I want a playoff

    42.4%
  • Total votes: 33
(1)
...
Share This  
Crop_45x45
or to post this comment

11 Comments

There are no comments yet. Get the conversation started by leaving the first comment

Loading more comments...
posted just now
  • Loading...
  • Nobody has liked this comment yet
Cancel

This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete

175
reads

11
comments

written on April 03, 2009 Opinion

The best newsletter on the web

Subscribe Now

We will never share your email address


CBS Sports Official Partner
Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Getty Images.
Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Getty Images is strictly prohibited.