A Call to the Hall for Schilling?

Rob Seguin by Contributor Written on March 31, 2009
BOSTON - OCTOBER 25:  Curt Schilling #38 of the Boston Red Sox tips his hat to the crowd as he comes out of the game in the sixth inning against the Colorado Rockies during Game Two of the 2007 Major League Baseball World Series at Fenway Park on October 25, 2007 in Boston, Massachusetts.  (Photo by Elsa/Getty Images) (Photo by Elsa/Getty Images)

Last Monday Curt Schilling announced on his blog, 38pitches.com, that he was retiring for baseball after a 20 season career.

The past week has brought up much debate on sports television, radio, web sites, and blogs about whether or not Curt Schilling belongs in the Baseball Hall of Fame. There are many statistical reasons why people feel that Schilling should not be a Hall of Famer.

People have brought up different areas in which Schilling's statistics are not adequate enough for the Hall. Some of these areas are not having enough wins, too high of a career ERA, subpar regular seasons, and never winning a Cy Young Award.

 

Wins: 216

Schill finished his career with a total of 216 wins, currently good enough for 80th all time. At the time of his retirement, he was 7th on the active list.

Schilling's Hall doubters point to this as one of the main reasons why he should not make it. However, people only look at the number and not the intangibles surround the number.

Between the strike shortened 1994 season and 1999, Schilling played for a Phillies team that did not finish the season over .500. It is tough to blame him for not amassing more wins because of the fact he was on a sub par team.

In this category, doubters also do not look at his winning percentage of .597, which is higher than many Hall of Famers including Bob Gibson, Steve Carlton, Catfish Hunter, and Don Drysdale (who won seven less games than Schilling).

 

ERA: 3.46

When dealing with ERA, era must be considered. Schilling played in the "Steroid Era" of baseball in which hitters were bashing the ball all over the place as a result of steroids. Pitchers also took them in order to combat the widespread use by hitters.

So where does that leave us with Schilling? His high career ERA must be examined with the Steroid Era in mind. At the time of his retirement, he was 11th on the active ERA list. In terms of starters who pitched throughout the Steroid Era, he is tied for 7th in that category behind Pedro Martinez (the only one with an ERA under three), Roger Clemens (who took steroids himself), Greg Maddux, Randy Johnson, John Smoltz, Kevin Brown, and is tied with David Cone.

In the coming years, Hall of Fame voters are going to have to consider steroids as a reason for inflated ERAs and factor that into their decision, like in the case of Schilling.

 

Regular Season

Critics have pointed to Schilling's sub par regular season performances noting that they were only made up for by his postseason success.

This discredits a lot of what Schilling has done throughout the years. In a time when pitchers rarely go the full none innings, Schilling has thrown 83 complete games-3rd on the active list. He has also thrown 20 shutouts-5th on the active list. He had the best strikeout to walk ratio among active players and the second best all time behind Tommy Boyd who pitched in the 1800s.

In addition, Schilling has over 3,000 strikeouts and is currently 15th all time and was 8th on the active list in that category.

Single Page
Vote Now! - Author Poll

Will Curt Schilling make the Hall of Fame?

  • First Ballot
  • Eventually
  • Not a Chance
vote to see results
Results - Author Poll

Will Curt Schilling make the Hall of Fame?

  • First Ballot

    0.0%
  • Eventually

    66.7%
  • Not a Chance

    33.3%
  • Total votes: 3
(0)
...
Share This  
Crop_45x45
or to post this comment

0 Comments

There are no comments yet. Get the conversation started by leaving the first comment

Loading more comments...
posted just now
  • Loading...
  • Nobody has liked this comment yet
Cancel

This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete

38
reads

0
comments

written on March 31, 2009 Opinion

The best newsletter on the web

Subscribe Now

We will never share your email address


CBS Sports Official Partner
Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Getty Images.
Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Getty Images is strictly prohibited.