Houston Texans Look to Hold off Broncos, Patriots for AFC's No. 1 Seed
The AFC playoff field is set but the seeds are not. Three teams remain in the hunt for the No. 1 seed based on Week 17 playoff scenarios.
The Houston Texans (12-3), Denver Broncos (12-3) and New England Patriots (11-4) all have a shot at the No. 1 seed. The best the Baltimore Ravens (10-5) can do is pass the Patriots to finish as the third seed.
After starting the season 11-1, the Texans have dropped two of their last three games. In Week 14, they visited the Patriots and lost 42-14, meaning New England holds the tiebreaker should the two teams finish with the same record.
In Week 15, Houston bounced back at home, beating the Indianapolis Colts, 29-17. However, last week the Minnesota Vikings came to town and upset the Texans, 23-6, despite Adrian Peterson rushing for just 86 yards, his lowest total since Week 6.
Yet, the Texans still control their own destiny, according to the playoff scenarios provided by NFL.com.
A win over Indianapolis (10-5) on Sunday would lock up the No. 1 seed for the Texans. A loss, however, could cost Houston the No. 1 seed and possibly even a bye.
The Broncos have won 10 consecutive games after losing early on to the Atlanta Falcons (13-2), Texans and Patriots. If Denver beats the Kansas City Chiefs (2-13) and Houston loses, the Broncos would secure the No. 1 seed in the AFC.
The Patriots could take the top seed because they own the three-way tiebreaker with Texans and Broncos. Should New England beat the Miami Dolphins (7-8) and the Texans and Broncos lose, all three teams would finish 12-4 and New England would take the No. 1 seed.
If the Broncos and Patriots both win and Houston loses, the Texans would fall to third and host the Cincinnati Bengals (9-6) in a rematch of last year’s Wild Card game.
It would be a disappointing way for the Texans to start their playoff run, considering they held the top spot in the AFC throughout the regular season.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?