MLB Rumors: Could Zack Greinke Find His Way Back to the Kansas City Royals?
It's still early on in free agency. Baseball's Winter Meetings have yet to begin, and Thanksgiving is but a few days in the past.
Still, the market for some of the season's top free agents has been developing slowly.
There are no clear front-runners for outfielders Josh Hamilton, Michael Bourn and B.J. Upton (though he'll reportedly decide this week), and the same goes for the year's top free agent pitcher, right-hander Zack Greinke.
Jon Heyman of CBSSports.com reports that executives around the league foresee Greinke attaining a six-year contract worth around $25 million per season. This would bring the total value of a contract to $150 million.
With the inevitable bidding war between the Angels and the Los Angeles Dodgers sure to happen—they're both very wealthy franchises—it's a safe bet to say that Greinke will become the richest pitcher in the history of baseball.
There's no clear front-runner amongst the two teams, though, and there will definitely be teams interested in acquiring an ace.
General manager Dayton Moore has already improved his starting rotation greatly this offseason. Acquiring Ervin Santana and signing Jeremy Guthrie represented important steps in the right direction.
But the team still lacks a true ace.
Bringing Greinke back would easily solve that problem, and could even propel the Royals to a season above .500 in 2013.
Greinke's breakout season came in 2009 as a member of the Royals. His 2.16 ERA over 229.1 innings was the best in the majors, as were his 205 ERA plus, 1.073 WHIP and 0.4 HR/9.
That led to his only career All-Star selection and a first-place voting for the American League Cy Young.
The Royals may not be willing to offer Greinke $150 million, but six years shouldn't be an issue for Moore.
If Greinke is willing to go down to about $125-130 million over the life of the contract, the Royals would likely be more inclined to make a play for him.
The chances of Kansas City landing Greinke are slim, as Heyman notes towards the end of his piece.
The Royals could still sneak in and make a play for him, though, and I wouldn't be surprised if they ended up reacquiring their ace.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?