Pittsburgh Steelers Shoot Themselves in the Foot by Signing Plaxico Burress
Harry How/Getty Images
On Tuesday, Pittsburgh Steelers head coach Mike Tomlin confirmed the team worked out two wide receivers—Plaxico Burress and Derrick Williams—and two quarterbacks—Brian Hoyer and Mike Kafka—and said it would be signing one of each.
At receiver, it looks like Burress—formerly of the Steelers, as well as the New York Giants and Jets—will be rejoining his former team, adding depth to a position that has been ravaged by injuries of late.
Antonio Brown is still sidelined with an ankle sprain, though he's questionable thus far to play in Week 12, and Jerricho Cotchery suffered cracked ribs against the Baltimore Ravens in Week 11, making it necessary that the Steelers pick up a free agent to bolster the ranks.
However, bringing Burress on is a huge mistake. Earlier this year, I said as much when Burress' name was being bounced around during Mike Wallace's holdout. Though the circumstances now are different, my opinion on the matter has not changed: The Steelers don't need Burress on their roster.
Rich Schultz/Getty Images
That brief history does not include the myriad legal troubles Burress found himself in beyond the notorious gun incident, and the me-first attitude that soured locker rooms against him. The latter is of the most concern presently and is the main reason why the Steelers giving him a second chance is a mistake.
Mike Ehrmann/Getty Images
Burress cannot get into the ears of Wallace or any of the other young Steelers receivers—the only learning opportunity he provides is a case study of what not to do.
If the Steelers were lacking locker-room drama, then they certainly upped the quotient of it by bringing Burress back. At most, the Steelers needed an emergency No. 4 or No. 5 receiver, someone to take Cotchery's snaps or jump briefly up the depth chart while Brown continues to heal. Burress did perform a marginal role for the Jets last year as their end-zone receiver, but there's no doubt he'd prefer to have a greater amount of responsibility than that, and the Steelers won't be—and shouldn't be—giving it to him.
Do you like that the Steelers brought Plaxico Burress back?
There's nothing wrong with Burress wanting to return to the NFL, and injuries such as those suffered by Cotchery and Brown were clearly his best ticket back. However, the Steelers are not an ideal landing spot. The decision to bring Burress back into the fold reeks of desperation for a team that's well-known for not making these types of seemingly desperate moves—it doesn't look smart or savvy, and it doesn't make sense just because he was once a Steeler.
The Steelers needed more receiver depth, to be sure, and Burress does provide that, but at what cost? This has the potential to create more problems than it solves, and the risk-to-reward ratio does not seem to benefit the Steelers either on or off the field.
While Pittsburgh had to make a move, this one was not the right one.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?