Why Alabama Is Smart to Aggressively Recruit 2014 4-Star QB Brandon Dawkins
Dawkins Via 247Sports
The Alabama Crimson Tide and Nick Saban are apparently recruiting 2014 4-star quarterback Brandon Dawkins very aggressively, which is bad news for the likes of Notre Dame, Utah and Tennessee. Conversely, it's a brilliant recruiting move by Alabama.
These are all schools that are on Dawkins' radar, according to 247sports—Notre Dame and Utah are the only two to offer so far—but it's Alabama that may be recruiting Dawkins the strongest, according to Justin Hopkins of 247sports:
Oregon, Alabama and LSU have recently stepped up their interest level.
"Oregon is really sending me a lot of mail now, a lot. Alabama is probably sending me the most mail of anyone, probably around 12-15 pieces of mail per week at least. I don't want to name early favorites, I'm trying to give everyone a fair shot."
Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images
Saban and the Crimson Tide are obviously very intent on making their intentions known to Dawkins very early, though—a smart move by the nation's most prolific recruiter.
Honestly, though, should you expect any less from him?
At 6'3'', 190 pounds as a junior, Dawkins looks like he has what it takes to be the real deal at the college level. He'll have plenty of time to bulk up and get bigger, and there really is no rush at Alabama.
Saban targets recruits based on what they can bring to his program as juniors and seniors, not necessarily as freshmen, so there's a lot to like in Dawkins.
He's got a very strong arm and throws an almost effortless deep ball. He's got good accuracy and touch, and he's also athletic enough to make plays with his feet.
Should Alabama make an offer?
If sending 12 to 15 pieces of mail to him a week in his junior year gives Saban an advantage, so be it.
Why not send 15 to 20?
He's a player who will be well worth it, so Alabama is very smart to be so aggressive in their recruitment of the 2014 quarterback.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?




2 Comments
Loading comments...
This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete