Are Alabama and LSU on a Collision Course for Another Game of the Century?
New No. 1 Alabama looked like a machine in its 41-14 dismantling of Michigan in the Cowboys Classic, and No. 3 LSU handled North Texas by the same score in Baton Rouge, La.
This begs the question, are the two SEC monsters on a collision course to another "Game of the Century" on Nov. 3 in Baton Rouge?
Let's not get ahead of ourselves.
Alabama certainly didn't appear fazed by the loss of six starters on defense. The Crimson Tide defense held a Michigan offense that averaged 405 yards per game in 2011 to just 269 on Saturday night, and proved the cliche that head coach Nick Saban doesn't just rebuild, he reloads.
The Tigers cruised down the stretch, and the final score isn't indicative of how dominating the Tigers were.
That number will only increase as teams focus on the run.
With that said, it's a bit presumptive to write Nov. 3 down in ink after the first week of the season, but I'd consider writing it in pencil.
Ronald Martinez/Getty Images
Alabama has to travel to Arkansas in two weeks and visit a suddenly dangerous Tennessee team in Knoxville on Oct. 20. Both of those offenses are capable of giving the Crimson Tide fits. In Arkansas' case, getting the Crimson Tide early in the season when some of the new starters are still settling in will be even more beneficial.
Will Alabama and LSU both be undefeated when they meet on Nov. 3?
Alabama and LSU both look like monsters again in 2012, and the first Saturday in November certainly looks like it could be the biggest day of the regular season for the second straight season. But let's not put the cart before the horse.
The SEC isn't just a two-team conference, even though the best two teams in the country current wear the SEC patch on their uniforms.
Let's let some of those teams give the Tide and the Tigers their best shots before we anoint the Alabama vs. LSU regular season matchup as a 2012 de facto national semifinal.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?