NBA Playoffs 2012: Mavs Coach Rick Carlisle Returns to the Chess Table
Dallas may still be figuring out how to function this season, but at the helm is an impressive basketball mind with a secure vision for where this Maverick team can go and how they need to go about getting there. That in itself doesn't guarantee that Dallas will remain consistent in their first-round series against Oklahoma City, but if offers a useful mechanism for in-playoff adaptation.
Carlisle pushed the Mavericks all the way through last year's postseason by exploiting matchup advantages and making key changes to his rotation and strategy over the course of each respective series.
That chess match begins anew. The Game 1 gauntlet (isn't that how chess matches begin?) has been thrown by Thunder head coach Scott Brooks and now Carlisle will be tasked with finding ways to free Dirk Nowitzki from OKC's pesky defense, get Jason Terry open after the Thunder blanketed him in the second half of Game 1, and find a counter for the offensive contributions of Serge Ibaka.
Dallas only lost Game 1 by a single point following a terrific—and difficult—shot from Kevin Durant, but Carlisle's responsibilities in light of his team's performance are many. He's more than capable of changing the orientation of sets. The nature of his rotation and the placement of certain players if need be, and it should be interesting to see how Carlisle goes about navigating Game 2 after his team's near-win.
Dallas played well, but hardly well enough to remain static. Considering the Mavs' struggles and circumstances, it's crucial that Carlisle not only come up with reasonable counters to Game 1's difficulties, but also think several moves ahead of Brooks and his staff.
The Mavericks are outmatched and if their regular season gives any decent indication into their nature then they're also woefully inconsistent. Carlisle's ability to change the team's direction mid-series might be one of the more profound advantages that they have, and the manifestation of that edge begins tonight.
Brooks is oft-criticized for his lack of x-and-o acumen, but thus far he has the upper hand on Carlisle, just as his team has the upper hand on the Mavericks.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?