Today is Feb. 27, 2008. March Madness begins in less than a month, and the regular season schedule is winding down to its final days before the heated conference tournaments begin. (No, you're not included Cornell.)
Parity in men's college basketball has increased exponentially in recent seasons. Some reasons for this? More and more kids seem to grow up playing basketball than ever before. Youth and travel leagues are increasing, and college recruiters seem to have increased and have more "connections" in different parts of the nation than ever before. If you are a star in your area, chances are a recruiter has heard of you and will bombard you with phone calls (or drunk texts at 4 a.m. if you're Kelvin Sampson).
Kids also seem to be growing bigger and stronger earlier in life. There absolutely may not be scientific or genetic proof behind that statement, but when I see 17-year-old boys looking like they should be on "The World's Strongest Man," I feel as if something has changed. Most importantly, the NBA has demanded that the young baller spend at least one year at a college or university before deciding whether they want to enter the NBA draft.
You combine the improved play of the game by children domestically and abroad, as well as improvements in coaching across the American basketball landscape, and the raucous environment that a university's home fans pass on to their beloved team during their home contests, and you have a recipe for parity across the college basketball landscape.
Simply put, it's becoming more acceptable for coaches to spew out basketball cliches, and truly believe what they're saying: "anyone can beat anyone on any given night," "they put their shoes on the same way that we do," "this might be the biggest game of your life." Hey, with the way this season has gone, who knows?
I can't tell you the number of teams who have fallen from their top 10 standing on a nightly basis. The number of "upsets" of top ten teams this season by teams either lower-ranked or unranked is astounding, and the number has to be some sort of record.
The Associated Press and ESPN top-25 rankings have become like a game of musical chairs being played on a scratched compact disc.
The only constant this season has been the No. 1 ranking, and that's been relinquished in recent days by Memphis and the Tennessee Vols, after UT earned the title for an impressive 29 hours after losing to Vandy on the road.
Where am I going with this? Picking a perfect bracket this year is going to be even more difficult than doing so in recent years. March Madness is something I looked forward to each season. In my pre-college years, my team was the Kentucky Wildcats, and I regularly chose them to get to the final four.
After deciding to go to a school in Tulane with no real positive tradition in basketball (aside from its point-shaving scandal in the late '80s that had the program suspended for two seasons), I was left with no real team to bet the house on.
Until this year.
4 comments Last one added about 1 year ago — Leave a Comment
Alex Kennedy about 1 year ago
Shouldn't this be in the College Basketball section?
Edit Comment Cancel
Andrew Perkins about 1 year ago
A healthy UCLA team would be tough to beat in March. I'm sure the Bruins' fans hope that the healthiness comes around.
Edit Comment Cancel
Tim Pollock about 1 year ago
I have to agree that the Bruins are the team to beat.
But you never know what can happen when the brackets come out.
Good read.
Edit Comment Cancel
Safa about 1 year ago
i agree, A.J. College basketball is very east-coast-centric. and this is apart from dick vitale riding the ACC's jock for whatever reason. UCLA is one of the few programs to be a consistent winner over the years, AND they're doing it with defense, shooting, and all the little things it takes to win tough games. plus, regardless of what the telecasters say the PAC-10 is the toughest conference in Div.I
Edit Comment Cancel
Leave a Comment
You must register to post a comment.