Supply and Demand: The Rangers Learn a Lesson from Redden's Contract

Justin Marques by Correspondent Written on January 07, 2009
Redden_feature

Henrik Lundqvist is a pretty good goalie, right? I mean, by all standards, we could all agree that he is a top-five goalie in the National Hockey League at the present moment, correct?

Good, now that we have that settled, we could also agree that Wade Redden is a top-five defenseman in the NHL, right? No, you say? He isn't? Then why on earth is he being paid nearly the same amount of money ($6.5 million per season) as one of the best goalies in the NHL?

That is the question that was bouncing around my head for months after the opening of the free agency period. I could not for the life of me understand why Sather would go out and spend an obscene amount of money on a defenseman who specializes on a good first pass out of the zone, and his offensive capabilities for a defenseman. Luckily for me, my answer came.

About one month ago, I was watching a Rangers broadcast on the MSG Network here on Long Island. According to color analyst Joe Michelletti, the New York Rangers had several major competitors in the Wade Redden sweepstakes this past offseason.

The fiercest competitor was apparently the Calgary Flames, who had offered Wade Redden the same exact contract that the Rangers have him signed to now (six years at $6.5 million per season). Michelletti stated that the Rangers just had to match the Flames' contract offer in order for Redden to be a blueshirt.

Unfortunately, the Rangers did match the Flames offer.

As the Flames drove up the price, the Rangers were quick to match it and take home what they thought would be a prized possession. Since there was such a short supply of great offensive defensemen in last year's free agent market, and such a high demand, the Rangers were quick to jump on the one that was considered better than the rest.

Unfortunately, in my personal opinion, Redden's woes in Ottawa have become even worse in New York City.

Why did I use the term "unfortunately" when explaining the Rangers signing of Redden? Simple answer, he has been just awful for the Rangers this season. Through 40 games played this season, Redden has posted just two goals and 14 assists for a whopping 16 points.

While his offensive production is not great by any means, his defensive numbers are worse. Redden is a minus six in the plus/minus category for a team that is in third place in the Eastern Conference. Suffice to say, it has been one tough year thus far for Redden.

Watching him play has been very hard for any Ranger fan. Knowing that he is eating up a large portion of the salary cap that could have been used to land Mats Sundin several weeks ago hurts even more.

His problems are numerous on the ice. First, and foremost, he is easily being beaten in one-on-one situations. For a guy that is 6' 2" and weighs 212 pounds, it is unreasonable for him not to use his body to his benefit. Secondly, he causes unnecessary turnovers in all three zones.

Watching him play throughout the season, I find Redden to be very nervous with the puck, and it leads him to make hasty decisions that result in turnovers and goals. Third, Redden does not seem to be utilizing his speed, which was a large part of his success two years ago with the Ottawa Senators.

Single Page
(0)
...
Share This  
Crop_45x45
or to post this comment

10 Comments

There are no comments yet. Get the conversation started by leaving the first comment

Loading more comments...
posted just now
  • Loading...
  • Nobody has liked this comment yet
Cancel

This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete

300
reads

10
comments

written on January 07, 2009 Opinion

Top Stories from NHL.com

NHL on B/R | Official Partners

The best Senators newsletter on the web

Subscribe Now

We will never share your email address


CBS Sports Official Partner
Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Getty Images.
Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Getty Images is strictly prohibited.