Chris Heisey or Drew Stubbs: Who Is Better in CF for the Cincinnati Reds?

Cliff Eastham@RedsToTheBoneSenior Writer IIFebruary 16, 2012

CHICAGO, IL - MAY 08: Drew Stubbs #6 of the Cincinnati Reds makes a catch at the wall of a ball hit by Carlos Pena of the Chicago Cubs in the 9th inning as teammate Chris Heisey #28 runs in at Wrigley Field on May 8, 2011 in Chicago, Illinois. The Reds defeated the Cubs 2-0. (Photo by Jonathan Daniel/Getty Images)
Jonathan Daniel/Getty Images

For the better part of two seasons, the Reds' faithful have been arguing over Chris Heisey's birthright of left field. I, too, have participated in such conversations. We have talked about he and Jonny Gomes, Fred Lewis, Todd Frazier, Dave Sappelt, Yonder Alonso and let me think, yeah, I think that covers it.

While we have argued the pros and cons of Heisey's future as the Reds' left fielder, we have watched the center fielder ring up the third-highest one-season strikeout number of all time.

Drew Stubbs is the starting point for many fan conversations himself. The 6'4" gazelle, with his blinding speed and seemingly unlimited range in the outfield, is offensively a Dave Kingman wannabe. He has already surpassed him in terms of strikeouts, but hasn't risen to the expected level of power yet.

Back to the Heisey-Stubbs comparison, let us start at the dish. Their career batting averages are both pitiful and are within three points of each other—Heisey ahead in that race with a .254 average.

Stubbs leads in OBP at .325 to .316, again, both very close.

Stubbs has only been used as a center fielder while Heisey has played all three outfield positions. There is method to my madness for bringing this up.

Stubbs can't blame his positioning on his dismal average and strikeout rate. Heisey has some room to use as leverage here. In both corner positions, he is batting below the Mendoza line and only has six home runs in left field and three in right field.

While playing center field, however, he blossoms into a good, not decent, good offensive machine. In center field, he has a career line of .333/.396/.626/1.022 with 11 HR and 23 RBI in only 39 games. You may say that is a small sampling, but I say that is going at nearly a 45 HR rate for a season.Why am I saying all of this? Perhaps Heisey is cut out to be a center fielder and not a corner man. Let's face it, when he plays in the middle, you are not giving up a considerable amount defensively.

As you may or may not know, I am not 100 percent sold on sabermetrics. However, a cursory look in that direction for the 2011 season shows us that, in center field, Heisey had a UZR of -1.5 while surprisingly Stubbs was worse at -2.5. Obviously, in that particular metric, both are underwater in terms of what normalcy should be.

If you glance at their range, Heisey wins in the RngR category as well in center field. And again, both are subpar.

If defense is the only thing keeping Heisey from starting in center field, I would like to direct you to 1951 when Ralph Kiner led the National League in homers yet the Pirates lost 112 games. When Kiner asked for more money, Branch Rickey told him, "We finished last with you, we can finish last without you."

So, what good does it do to trot the fastest man in the National League out every day when his strikeout rate is obscene and his power performance is lacking?

What is my suggestion? One of two avenues: Either move Heisey to center field and start Stubbs in left or bench him and start Ryan Ludwick in left instead.

Stubbs' speed is diminished, if not negated, by his anemic OBP and failure as a bunter. Most speedsters can lay down a pretty good bunt. Stubbs looks like a American League middle reliever trying to bunt, or a deer caught in someone's headlights.

There you have it, the left field quandary can now end, insofar as Heisey is concerned.

Your thoughts?

Follow me on Twitter

Read more on my MLB blog