NFL Playoff Picture: Patriots and Packers Hope to Avoid Recent Playoff Trend
Winslow Townson/Getty Images
A recent NFL trend, however, seems to indicate that home-field advantage may not be as valuable as it used to be: the trend of top-seeded NFL playoff teams going one-and-done.
In years past, a top-seeded team was a veritable lock to host a conference championship game.
This was especially true in the NFC.
From 1990—the year the NFL expanded the playoffs to 12 teams—until 2006, every top-seeded NFC team hosted the NFC Championship Game. Top-seeded NFC teams were 17-0 in the divisional round over that period of time.
Ironically, the very next year, the Giants were the No. 1 seed when they lost to the Philadelphia Eagles in the divisional playoffs.
In the AFC, No. 1 seeds have historically had a tougher time winning in the divisional playoffs.
From 1990 until 2004, five top-seeded teams fell in the divisional round: the Pittsburgh Steelers in 1992, the Kansas City Chiefs in 1995 and 1997, the Denver Broncos in 1996 and the Tennessee Titans in 2000.
Since 2005, it has gotten even harder for a No. 1 AFC seed to win a divisional playoff game.
Last year, both top seeds—the Atlanta Falcons in the NFC and the New England Patriots in the AFC—were one-and-done.
This year, however, the Patriots hope to redeem themselves.
The Packers—Super Bowl winners last year as the sixth seed—also hope to avoid a dose of their own medicine.
Both are playing teams they beat in December.
Those games don't matter now, though.
What does matter is this: Will the Patriots and Packers meet in the Super Bowl, or will they join the list of top-seeded teams that went one-and-done in the NFL playoffs?
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?