Oklahoma Tops Preseason BlogPoll
Here is my preseason ballot. The only change is the addition of Wake Forest and the deletion of California.
|1||Oklahoma||Good – Dominant offensive line, Sam Bradford, fast defense; Bad – Running backs coming off injuries|
|2||Ohio State||Good – Heisman-contending tailback, dominant linebackers and shut down corners; Bad – NCG hangover, suspensions|
|3||Southern Cal||Good – Scary defense, endless supply of running backs; Bad – Injured Sanchez, uncertainty at WR|
|4||Georgia||Good – Unbelievable running game, tremendous secondary; Bad – Sturdivant injury and suspensions|
|5||Missouri||Good – Top 5 offense, underrated defense; Bad – Target on back, depth|
|6||Florida||Good – Unstoppable offense with Tebow and Harvin; Bad – Horrible pass defense, tons of ACL injuries!|
|7||Clemson||Good – Best offensive backfield in the nation, loaded secondary; Bad – Will they crumble under expectations again?|
|8||LSU||Good – Offensive and defensive lines are amazing; Bad – Ivy league quarterback and no known leaders|
|9||Texas||Good – Muschamp will help D, the offense is always good; Bad – Who is the RB?|
|10||Wisconsin||Good – Loaded at RB, TE, and D-line; Bad – Uh, quarterback?|
|11||Texas Tech||Good – Best passing game ever?; Bad – The defense is average. Does it matter?|
|12||West Virginia||Good – White and Devine should be awesome behind five returning linemen; Bad – New coaching staff, defense lost playmakers|
|13||Auburn||Good – The defense will be superb again. Bad – Do they have a quarterback and receivers for their new offense?|
|14||Penn State||Good – The defensive line is fantastic with Maurice Evans, great trio of receivers; Bad – Who is lining up in the backfield?|
|15||Kansas||Good – Reesing is back and the linebackers are very solid; Bad – No running back.|
|16||Tennessee||Good – Defensive back seven is good and RB Foster will produce; Bad – Crompton needs to improve|
|17||Oregon||Good – Great secondary and nice offensive line; Bad – Who’s the quarterback?|
|18||Boston College||Good – Excellent defense, solid receivers; Bad – No proven running backs, poor special teams|
|19||Illinois||Good – Juice Williams and the offensive line; Bad – Linebackers and running backs need work|
|20||Brigham Young||Good – The offense should score tons of points with Max Hall and Co.; Bad – the defensive back seven needs some work|
|21||Arizona State||Good – Rudy carpenter and the receivers will be great if…; Bad – the offensive line can block after giving up 55 sacks last year|
|22||South Florida||Good – Grothe is back and should have more talent around him; Bad – The defense lost a lot but returns George Selvie on the edge|
|23||Pittsburgh||Good – LeSean McCoy is the real deal and the defensive line should be the Big East’s finest; Bad – Quarterback and offensive line issues could hold McCoy and the offense back|
|24||Virginia Tech||Good – Experience at quarterback behind a nice offensive line; Bad – No proven playmakers on offense; Glennon is a bit of a liability|
|25||Wake Forest||Good – A surprisingly good defense and Riley Skinner under center; Bad – Zero receivers will lead to unbalanced offense|
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?