NBA Free Agency Rumors: Is a Joe Johnson Sign-and-Trade In the Works?
This offer makes it only a matter of time before Johnson, who can't get a better deal financially anywhere else, signs on the dotted line.
But I have a question no one—not even TNT's David Aldridge—is asking.
Does this contract mean Johnson will be in a Hawks uniform next season?
The simple but possibly naive answer is yes. Johnson was the leader of a Hawks team that won 53 games and advanced to the second round of the playoffs last season. Johnson's return to a young, talented and improving team (Josh Smith, Al Horford and Marvin Williams are all under the age of 25) all but ensures a similar run for the Hawks next season.
But, if Atlanta's front office was unwilling to give Johnson this kind of contract all season long, why are they so aggressively willing to do so now? Especially, considering Johnson's atrocious showing—39 percent from the field; 22 percent on threes—in the playoffs.
Jamal Crawford, the Sixth Man of the Year, can seamlessly step into the starting two-guard slot and allow the Hawks to focus on their biggest need, a center. Isn't this a wiser alternative to giving Johnson, who averaged just 17.8 points and shot 40 percent in 29 playoff games with the Hawks, a contract that will pay him over $23 million when he's 35 years old?
Hawks management was willing to let him go all along yet, now they want him back like a high school girlfriend.
Don't get it twisted—something bigger is at play here.
I believe Johnson could be mulling over a sign-and-trade to another team.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?