Is Paul Pierce the NBA's Third-Best Player?
Surely I considered him one of the better forwards in the NBA prior to the 2007-08 season. Then, after watching him lead the Big Three and the Celtics to the NBA championship that year, it was difficult not to consider Pierce an elite player.
And he's struck again this postseason. After a pair of lukewarm games early in the Cleveland series, Pierce got back on track and carried the Cs to the Eastern Conference semifinal-round triumph.
And he was just as dominant in the conference finals at Orlando, leading visiting Boston to a pair of wins in Games 1 and 2, then saving his best effort for the sixth and final game of the series in which he had 31 points and 13 rebounds in a blowout of the Magic.
Pierce can beat you many ways on the offensive end. He's got good enough range to be considered a serious threat from three-point range, he can knock down the mid-range elbow jumper, he can slash or at least craft his way to the basket, and he can bang underneath for some garbage scraps. He truly is a quadruple threat, and he's not a bad defender on the other end. And though he never smiles, he plays with huge heart and passion and that does matter.
While the NBA's great debate continues to ask one simple question—LeBron or Kobe?—I think it's time we start to recognize that Pierce just might be the league's third-best player.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?