Are the Boston Celtics Too Old To Win Another Championship?

Use your ← → (arrow) keys to browse more stories
Are the Boston Celtics Too Old To Win Another Championship?
Photo: Orland Sentinel

In my early predictions article, the majority of commenter's felt I overstated my expectations for this year’s upcoming Boston Celtics team.

Age and its associated drop-off were the mains reason people thought the C’s would not reach the NBA finals again (Miami’s talent being the other main reason).

On paper it may appear to be a valid concern, but as history will show us below, the 2011 Celtics, while above the median age, are not a bunch of dinosaurs roaming the NBA in search of another championship.     

They are still the ‘Big 3’ and not the ‘Big Triassic’.

Below are the championship winning teams from the past 20 years, ordered from oldest average age to youngest:

YEAR TEAM PLYRS AGE
AVG
1996 CHI 15 446
29.73333
1999 LAL 14 415
29.64286
2004 DET 15 443
29.53333
1998 CHI 17 501
29.47059
2007 SAS 16 471
29.43750
2011 BOS 15 428  
28.53333
2008 BOS 15 427
28.46667

2005
SAS 17 483
28.41176
2003 SAS 17 481
28.29412
ALL ALL 310 8752
28.23226
1997 CHI 16 451
28.18750
1992 CHI 16 451
28.18750
1995 HOU 17 479
28.17647
2001 LAL 15 422
28.13333
2000 LAL 15 419
27.93333
1993 CHI 17 472
27.76471
2010 LAL 13 359
27.61538
2002 SAS 15 414
27.60000
2006 MIA 17 469
27.58824
1994 HOU 15 410
27.33333
1991 CHI 12 319
26.58333
2009 LAL 16 420
26.25000

 

 

 

(Source: Basketball-reference.com)


Some of the numbers that immediately jump out are as followed:

1: Four of the five teams older than the 2011 Celtics only won one championship.  The Chicago Bulls with the greatest player of all-time being the exception.  This helps the Celtics case by not skewing the numbers in favor of a three-peat or dynasty, since the 1997 Bulls were a much younger team (even with 43-year-old Robert Parish).

2: The teams are spread out over the past 20 years.  There is no trend to indicate that the early 90’s were a time that older teams flourished, etc.

3: The youngest teams to win championships are also spread out over the past 20 years, again eliminating trends skewed towards a particular time frame.  The teams are also mixed, eliminating the dynasty theory favoring younger teams.   

4: The 2003 Detroit Pistons and 2007 San Antonio Spurs were team oriented squads.  These aren’t teams that had superstars who dominated the time of possession unlike the Kobe and Jordan’s teams.

What does it all mean?

Well it means that the Celtics should not be counted out as a potential NBA champion solely based off of the age of their team.  

You could easily make the argument that the Lakers, Heat, Orlando Magic, Dallas Mavericks, etc, are better teams, but if they are to prevent the Celtics from reaching Green 18, these teams will have to outperform Boston on the court and not in the preseason media guide.

Load More Stories

Follow Boston Celtics from B/R on Facebook

Follow Boston Celtics from B/R on Facebook and get the latest updates straight to your newsfeed!

Out of Bounds

Boston Celtics

Subscribe Now

We will never share your email address

Thanks for signing up.