The Lakers and Celtics meeting in the 2010 NBA Finals was somewhat expected by many NBA fans.
Between them, they have 33 championships. Obviously, they know how to win even if they've had their down seasons.
Some teams disappoint in the Playoffs. Utah, Toronto, Phoenix, Orlando, New Orleans, Minnesota, Memphis, the Clippers, Denver, Dallas, Cleveland and Charlotte are current NBA teams with no championship rings to speak of.
If you look at the past five years, it's very clear that Denver, Dallas, Cleveland and Phoenix have all underachieved in the Playoffs.
After "The Decision" was reached, much has been made about LeBron's performance during the Cavs-Celtics series. Is it accurate?
Some have argued that LeBron's game was far superior to Paul Pierce's.
But what about players' performances in the Playoffs compared to their regular seasons?
Taking a look at the sixteen teams that made the Playoffs in 2010, each team had a star that could claim the team as their own.
Though some of the teams suffered injuries and lost their regular season leaders and others, like Phoenix, could have been Team Nash or Team Stoudemire, I have attempted to look at the 2010 Playoffs sixteen teams' leaders and analyze how they stacked up to their own regular season performances.
Who stepped it up? Who disappointed?
In order, from those who stepped up most to the ones who lost the most:
Overachievers (+5 or more):
Achievers (0 to +4):
Underachievers (-1 to -6, poorer in categories listed):
As we know, teams make the difference in the Playoffs and statistics don't tell the story as well as our eyes, but statistically, this was how the leaders performed.
Utah, Charlotte, Milwaukee and Chicago have something special to look forward to next year.