Man, am I tired of seeing Kobe Bryant compared to Michael Jordan, and seeing MVP awards given to him for his reputation, rather than his performance.
Let's face it: Kobe's overrated. Historically so.
To start with, here's Kobe's stat line from last night's NBA Finals Game Seven: 23 points (6-24 FG, 0-6 3-FG), 15 rebounds, 2 assists, 1 steal and 4 turnovers.
Jordan would never, ever have dropped that kind of nuclear stink bomb in a Game Seven, that's assuming the Best Ever would have allowed a Finals series to get to a Game Seven (he didn’t), or lose a Finals (he didn’t).
Bryant, on the other hand, missed the playoffs in his prime (the 2004-2005 season), one of only two times in the last 34 years the Los Angeles Lakers have missed the playoffs as a team. He has lost two NBA Finals opportunities.
As he pointed out, he’s won one more championship than Shaquille O’Neal. Which would be impressive if Shaquille O’Neal weren’t fat and lazy.
He also has one championship less than Scottie Pippen. Well, I suppose you could argue that Pippen had help, but the point needed to be made.
Perhaps you’ve been awed by Bryant’s past playoff performance?
Michael Jordan: 33.4 PPG (48.7% FG), 6.4 RPG, 5.7 APG
Kobe Bryant: 25.5 PPG (44.8% FG), 5.2 RPG, 4.8 APG
Allen Iverson: 29.7 PPG (40.1% FG), 3.8 RPG, 6.0 APG
That’s right, someone who is in the conversation for greatest of all-time has scored four points-per-game less in the playoffs than Allen Iverson.
For the purposes of context, Iverson has also played more than a hundred playoff games less than Bryant. But do we really think that his points would be the number that came down with more games?
So together, let’s scale back the talk about how the Black Mamba is the greatest ever.
If someone isn’t the clear best player in his team’s history (and I don’t care how great his team’s history is), we have to agree that it’s really tough to argue that he’s the best player in league history.
Speaking of which, what’s LeBron up to these days?
Like the new article format? Send us feedback!