Roy Halladay, Cliff Lee, Cole Hamels, Roy Oswalt... What is and what isn't with the best 1-2-3-4 of the decade?
They're not going to win 80 games. They're not going to have the top three Cy Young vote getters. They're not all going to stay healthy.
They're not all going to win 20 games or make 30 starts. In fact, I bet they don't all make 25 starts.
They will be good enough to win the NL East. They will be very difficult to beat in the playoffs.
2010: 21-10, 2.44 ERA, 1.041 WHIP, 250.2 IP, 219 K
Best case scenario 2011: 22-8, 2.50 ERA, 1.09 WHIP, 230 IP, 209 K
Halladay just had his first playoff experience, which was phenomenal, but he ended the season with 272.2 innings pitched. That's a career high, and he is 33 years old.
He is still a machine, with the league's best conditioning program, and he will still be one of the best pitchers in baseball, but there is cause for concern. The Phillies might do well to give him an extra day of rest from time to time, especially in July and August if the Phillies have a comfortable lead in the division.
2010: 12-9, 3.18 ERA, 1.003 WHIP, 212 IP, 185 K
Best case scenario 2011: 19-6, 2.91 ERA, 1.005 WHIP, 200 IP, 175 K
Lee was good in 2010. He wasn't stellar. He looked bad against bad teams. That was the question with Lee. Why was he dominating the Yankees and then getting shelled by Baltimore?
He passed up more money from several teams, including the Yankees, to come back to Philadelphia. This is where he wants to be, and he is back in the National League, which could bode well for his ERA. He is a top-10 starter, but age and workload are concerns.
2010: 12-11, 3.06 ERA, 1.179 WHIP, 208.2 IP, 211 K
Best case scenario: 15- 9, 3.05 ERA, 1.100 WHIP, 200 IP, 205 K
The 27-year-old "kid" of the group has never won more than 15 games, or had an ERA under three, and he has been with this team longer than the other three combined, so his numbers are least likely to change.
That being said, at 27, he has some room to grow. But even if his 2010 becomes the standard for the next four or five years, the Phillies can't complain.
Don't expect more than 15 wins, or an ERA under three, but he will put up quality starts and, if he stays healthy, there's no reason to expect less than 200 K.
2010: 13-13, 2.76 ERA, 1.025 WHIP, 211.2 IP, 193 K
Best case scenario: 14-6, 2.80 ERA, 1.005 WHIP. 205 IP, 185 K
Yes, his ERA was really that low last year. And in 12 starts for the Phillies, Oswalt 1.74 ERA and .895 WHIP and was 7-1.
I call him the ugly duckling because, at some point, he got lost in Houston. Pitchers tend to do that, but he has been one of the more underrated starters in the game for the last half-decade.
There is some room to regression considering his age and career workload, but 15 wins and an ERA around three are certainly possible, if he stays healthy.
2010: 9-6. 4.82 ERA, 1.417 WHIP, 175.2 IP, 134 K
Best case scenario: 10-10, 4.50 ERA, 1.39 WHIP, 175 IP, 140 K
No pressure on Blanton, is there? He doesn't stick out of this group like Allen Iverson in Europe does he?
Blanton will not be the only starter who fills this rotation slot. The Phillies have options, but he will start the season here and will do what he does. Expect around 10 wins and an ERA around 4.50. If the Phillies can deal with that, then he will stick.
This reminds me of the 2008 New York Mets, but opposite. Every fifth day, Johan Santana would be on the mound and the team had a bit of a skip in its step. Now, every fifth day Joe Blanton takes the hill. It will be interesting to watch runs scored per start for Blanton as opposed to the others.
2010: 51 games, 15 holds, 5 saves, 2.55 ERA, 1.038 WHIP, 10.9 K/9
Best case scenario, 27 holds, 7 saves, 2.35 ERA, 1.000 WHIP, 11 K/9
Madson is one of the better setup men in the game and would be the clear-cut closer if Brad Lidge falters. He is a rock in the 8th inning and is content with his role.
Considering all four aces have a tendency to get through at least seven innings, Madson is likely to be taking a lot of games over directly from them.
This means he is likely to be ahead a lot. Fantasy leagues know he is one of the best holds sources in the game, and the Phillies are happy to have him bridge the gap to their closer.
2010: 50 games, 27 saves, 2.96 ERA, 1.226 WHIP, 10.2 K/9
Best case scenario: 43 saves, 2.31 ERA, 1.015 WHIP, 10 K/9
As expected, Lidge's 2010 was almost a perfect split of his near-perfect 2008 and his catastrophic 2009.
His 2010 was about what can be expected moving forward, with perhaps an uptick in saves due to the rotation handing over many close leads, and the offense having questions.
I think he is a lock for 30 saves, barring injury, and the ERA should hang between 2.7 and 2.9. But Madson is waiting in the wings, just in case. Be sure he wont be allowed to sputter as long as he was in 2009. The leash will be shorter.