NFL Playoffs: Jets Stun Patriots, And Tom Brady Makes Peyton Manning Look Good
Everyone was talking about how Manning would never be as good as Tom Brady is in the playoffs; that Tom Brady is simply the best when the regular season ends.
My, how the tables have turned.
Brady turned in, at best, a mediocre performance against the same Jets that beat Manning last week.
Manning went 18-for-26 for 225 yards, one touchdown and no interceptions last week. He had a 69.2 percent completion percentage, an average completion of 12.5 yards and a very respectable QB rating of 108.7.
Brady went 29-for-45 for 299 yards, two touchdowns and one interception this week. He had a 64.4 percent completion percentage, an average completion of 10.3 yards and a QB rating of 89.0.
Brady's 89.0 isn't terrible, but his regular season rating was 111.0 and he hasn't been as bad as 89.0 since Week 7. Manning went the other way, posting 16.8 points higher than his regular season rating of 91.9.
Who's the better QB?
I understand that rating isn't everything, and Brady did have 11 more completions and 74 more yards than Manning, but several other key factors swing things Manning's way.
Brady was sacked five times despite regularly having a lot of time in the pocket. Brady seemed unwilling to scramble and just took the sacks frequently, including one for a fumble that Brady was lucky the Patriots recovered.
Also, considering that Manning was missing two of his favorite targets in Dallas Clark and Austin Collie, it was a pretty good day for Peyton.
Furthermore, both QBs scored on four possessions, but Brady had the ball 11 times to Manning's eight (not including one possession at the end of the first half when both took a knee to kill the clock). Two of Brady's possessions also resulted in two turnovers on downs.
Obviously, this whole discussion is a moot point, since both teams were beaten by the somewhat surprising Jets, but this is a look at the clutch performances for all those Brady fans who think he's superior to Peyton Manning.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?