Saints Bounty: Reactions to Warren Sapp Calling Jeremy Shockey a Snitch

Use your ← → (arrow) keys to browse more stories
Saints Bounty: Reactions to Warren Sapp Calling Jeremy Shockey a Snitch
Scott Cunningham/Getty Images

And so the finger-pointing in the New Orleans Saints bounty scandal begins.

According to Warren Sapp, Jeremy Shockey was the "snitch" that alerted the NFL to the bounties placed on opposing players by ex-New Orleans defensive coordinator Gregg Williams:

But CBS Sports' Mike Freeman is reporting that Shockey wasn't the "source" in the scandal:

So why the quotes around the words snitch and source?

Because judging Shockey—or whomever the informant was in this situation—as a snitch is flat-out stupid way of looking at this situation.

Shockey, for what it is worth, is denying that he had anything to do with the situation:

Whomever informed the NFL of this despicable bounty system should be admired for looking out for the safety of NFL players, not chastised for breaking some sort of unspoken and archaic code of silence that people fall back on to protect themselves from the repercussions of their deplorable actions.

But hey, I'm not the only one who thinks so. Chris Kluwe, for one, is pissed. I can't post his angry tweets here, but you can check them out for yourself.

And Bart Hubbuch of the New York Post chimes in and agrees with both of us:

So think before you tweet, Warren Sapp. The "snitches get stitches" mentality has no place in the NFL. The health and well-being of others in the league should take precedence over protecting the idiots who participated in the bounty system found in New Orleans.

There are no snitches here. Only admirable and much-needed sources of information.

 

Hit me up on Twitter—I've tweeted from Lehigh's campus before. Seriously.

Follow TRappaRT on Twitter

Load More Stories

Follow B/R on Facebook

Out of Bounds

NFL

Subscribe Now

We will never share your email address

Thanks for signing up.