Denver Broncos: Young Wide Receiving Corps Will Be New Face of Franchise
Aside from free agency acquisition Willis McGahee, the Denver Broncos have almost no veteran leadership on their offense.
All of Denver's fans are counting on Tebow to be the spark the Broncos so desperately need to save a dying season and propel the team into a successful winning tradition once again.
However, Tebow will not be the most important factor in Denver's football renaissance.
In Week 7, and going forward, it will be the young and exciting wide receivers that Denver employs who will face the toughest challenge and hopefully give the most return.
The newly appointed starting quarterback Tebow has long been criticized of being an inaccurate thrower. It will be up to the receivers in Denver to help turn this view around.
Eric Decker, a second-year player from Minnesota, has already made his bid for the No. 1 WR spot for the Broncos.
Returning from injury, joining him this week will be fan-favorite Eddie Royal, who was rumored to be on the trading block earlier in the week. Royal has been ineffective over the course of his last two seasons after a breakout rookie year.
On the field for Denver in Week 7 is another receiver returning from injury—one that fans have not seen on the field for more than a year.
Demaryius Thomas, a former first-round pick out of Georgia Tech, is finally back from a season-ending Achilles injury in 2010.
There's a lot of room to make up for with the absence of Brandon Lloyd, who single-handedly made the Broncos offense relevant last year, leading the league with 1,448 receiving yards.
Thomas, Royal and, my favorite, Decker need to fill a huge void and put forth a tremendous effort for the next 11 weeks in order to usher Tebow and the rest of this franchise into a new era.
They might not be viable fantasy football options in the coming weeks, considering Tebow's style of play and head coach John Fox's run-first attitude, but they'll certainly play an important role in the minds of anybody rooting for the Blue and Orange in 2011 and beyond.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?