Johnny Jolly Arrested: Suspended Packer Jolly Throws Career Away for Codeine
There is nothing funny nor fortunate about what Johnny Jolly has endured. The man has issues with codeine, and it may have just ended his career.
The Green Bay Packers are mere months removed from a wonderful moment that will be savored by fans for decades. The Packers lineman was not able to share in the wondrous Super Bowl victory. He was suspended at the time for codeine possession.
On Monday, NFL.com reported Jolly had been arrested arrested and charged with drug possession and tampering with evidence. The tampering with evidence charge comes as Jolly attempted to conceal the codeine from officers.
The news may serve as the final nail in Jolly's career coffin. In 2008, Jolly plead guilty for illegal possession of codeine. His legal issues saw him suspended from the NFL indefinitely in 2010.
The 28-year-old Jolly is under contract with the Packers until the end of 2011. The chances of him suiting up for the Packers were already slim. It is far more likely that he will never play for any team.
Will Jolly Ever Play in NFL Again?
There is no way that an NFL team will take a chance on a man that has clearly made his choice in life. Codeine is far more important than anything to him, and it is costing him his livelihood.
Jolly began the process for reinstatement in February. The league may have been willing to take a chance at another stint with Jolly. Now, that chance has been flushed away, never to return.
It is a sad sight to see someone with little control over their life. The worst part is Jolly may not have learned his lesson. Arrests couldn't set him straight before, so there is little hope they can do so now.
We should get used to using the following term when referring to Johnny Jolly. It is the one that will identify him from here on out, and that is former NFL player. I hope he enjoys his codeine, because it just cost him his career.
What is the duplicate article?
Why is this article offensive?
Where is this article plagiarized from?
Why is this article poorly edited?