San Francisco Giants Roster Moves: 5 Implications of Hector Sanchez Promotion

By (Contributor) on July 15, 2011

848 reads

11

Previous
1 of 7
Next
Images_display_image

Today's promotion of 21-year-old minor league catcher Hector Sanchez has several potential implications for the San Francisco Giants

As reported by Andy Baggerly of the San Jose Mercury-News, the switch-hitting Sanchez replaces outfielder Pat Burrell on the Giants' 25-man roster. Burrell goes on the 15-day disabled list, the consequence of a painful foot bone spur.

For those expecting a blockbuster deal to boost the Giants' anemic offense, adding an unproven rookie isn't going to get the pulse racing.

But, this move likely is the first of several dominoes that will fall as Brian Sabean tries to position his club for a deep postseason run.

Here are five likely implications of adding Sanchez.

1) Someone Is About to Be Demoted

DETROIT, MI - JULY 01: Chris Stewart #37 of the San Francisco Giants celebrates with teammates after scoring on a ninth inning bases loaded walk while playing the Detroit Tigers at Comerica Park on July 1,  2011 in Detroit, Michigan. San Francisco won the
Gregory Shamus/Getty Images

Someone will need to be removed from the Giants' 40-man roster to make room for Sanchez. That's because 15-day disabled players (in this case, Burrell) remain on the 40-man list.

The 60-day disabled, however, do not count against the 40-man limit. Mychael Urban of CSNBayArea.com speculated today that someone else might be placed on the extended disabled list. (more on that in next slide)

Urban may be right. It's also foreseeable that the Giants could demote catcher Chris Stewart or infielder Emmanuel Burriss (the latter option is viable now that Mike Fontenot has returned). Stewart would have to clear waivers.

Urban, however, also noted that Stewart has become Tim LIncecum's catcher-designate (as Eli Whiteside was previously for Jonathan Sanchez). If so, the Giants would be carrying three catchers and four outfielders—and that doesn't seem plausible for more than a few days.

2) Someone Goes on the 60-Day Disabled List

SAN FRANCISCO, CA - JUNE 10: Manager Bruce Bochy (L) of the San Francisco Giants helps injured second baseman Freddy Sanchez #21 up and off the field as Pat Burrell #5 looks on against the Cincinnati Reds during a MLB baseball game June 10, 2011 at AT&T P
Thearon W. Henderson/Getty Images

Urban speculated that there are two reasonable candidates to be moved to the longer-term disabled list: Freddy Sanchez or Mark DeRosa.

If it's Sanchez, that's news. The Giants have indicated that the injured second baseman was rehabbing and hoping for a return sometime in the season's second half. Given his value and postseason experience, it figures the club wouldn't want to foreclose that possibility.

Unless, that is, Sanchez knows his shoulder likely needs surgery and the public talk about a return is intended to help Sabean avoid appearing desperate in trade negotiations. We'll see.

DeRosa seems a likelier candidate to go on the 60-day DL. Since he's under contract, he couldn't be released unless an agreement is reached with the club on an injury settlement. That, too, is a possibility.

3) Sanchez Is Being Showcased as Trade Bait

SAN FRANCISCO, CA - JULY 10:  Injured Buster Posey #28 of the San Francisco Giants waves to the crowd while sitting in the dugout during their game against the New York Mets at AT&T Park on July 10, 2011 in San Francisco, California.  (Photo by Ezra Shaw/
Ezra Shaw/Getty Images

A gentleman named Buster has to be taken into account in any discussion of other Giant catching prospects. 

Assuming Posey is healthy enough to return in 2012, the Giants may consider Sanchez an expendable asset in seeking help at other positions. 

Productive switch-hitting catchers don't fall from trees, and Sanchez has hit .300 or better at Class A San Jose and Triple-A Fresno.

While offensively capable, Sanchez's defense reportedly is not yet major league calibre. If Sabean is considering a deal with a club not needing immediate help behind the dish (Minnesota, for example), Sanchez could be an attractive bargaining chip.

4) a Veteran Is Going to Be Released

SAN FRANCISCO, CA - JULY 10:  Miguel Tejada #10 of the San Francisco Giants hits a single that scored Mike Fontenot #14 in the seventh inning of their game against the New York Mets at AT&T Park on July 10, 2011 in San Francisco, California.  (Photo by Ez
Ezra Shaw/Getty Images

Call this my "Wishful thinking" option.

The Giants' roster is cluttered with unproductive veterans. Burrell is/was one of them; he's out of the equation temporarily. 

Other vets, however, are taking up space (and $) while delivering little value. Someone has to come off of the 40-man roster.

Is it inconceivable that the Giants might cut ties with Miguel Tejada? He's making relatively modest money. He's proven he can't play any position (competently) other than 3B, which has an established incumbent. 

And, most of all, he continues to have the most undisciplined at-bats of any Giant this side of Andres Torres. Did Tejada's 12th-inning at bat last night against San Diego—a first-pitch, jam-shot pop up after the three previous Giants had reached via two walks and an error by the pitcher—not give you heartburn?

5) Outfield Help Is on the Way

PHOENIX, AZ - JULY 12:  American League All-Star Michael Cuddyer #5 of the Minnesota Twins throws the ball during the 82nd MLB All-Star Game at Chase Field on July 12, 2011 in Phoenix, Arizona.  (Photo by Jeff Gross/Getty Images)
Jeff Gross/Getty Images

Burrell's absence means the Giants have four outfielders on their active roster. It's inconceivable it will stay that way for long.

Emmanuel Burriss was playing LF late last night (or was it early this morning?) in San Diego—evoking memories of Derrel Thomas—but that can't be the long-range plan.

Unless the price is simply too steep for Sabean, we must (and should) assume he is going to acquire an outfielder, and create roster space for whoever-he-is by demoting, trading or releasing someone else. (see earlier slides for options for all three)

We can speculate, and salivate, about just which outfielder it may be—something tells me it might NOT be the likes of Beltran or Cuddyer—but there seem to be only two viable scenarios:

1) Sabean acquires someone to play a corner outfield spot and create room for him (see above)

2) The Giants acquire a bat for another position and move existing position players around (hmm—like acquiring a third baseman, moving Sandoval to first base and Huff to the outfield).

Just saying: moves made are rarely the moves about which there is greatest speculation. Call that the David DeJesus rule.

Begin Slideshow
Keep Reading
Flag
Props (1)
This article is

What is the duplicate article?

Why is this article offensive?

Where is this article plagiarized from?

Why is this article poorly edited?

Flag This Article
San Francisco Giants San Francisco Giants: Like this team?
Crop_45x45
or to post a comment

11 Comments

There are no comments yet. Get the conversation started by leaving the first comment

Loading comments...
just now posted just now
  • Loading...
  • Nobody has liked this comment yet
Cancel

This comment and all replies have been deleted This comment has been deleted Undo delete

Follow B/R on Facebook

Fans of bleacherreport

Follow @BleacherReport on Twitter
San Francisco Giants

Subscribe Now

We will never share your email address

Thanks for signing up.

We're Scouting Top Writers

Preview Cubs vs Giants Hint: you can use arrow keys to navigate through this channel.